If Spurs did that explains why the PL lost then. Spurs can't win anything.I thought spurs did too?
If Spurs did that explains why the PL lost then. Spurs can't win anything.I thought spurs did too?
I thought spurs did too?
NoDid the tribunal make any ruling on costs ?
New APT rules and FFP implications moving forward. Basically the PL can't arbitrarily cap a sponsorship deal from counting as revenue. Plus some more stuff but that's the gist.
I don't disagree.Funny no rival fans kick up a stink about shareholder loans.
The cynic in me would suggest that the loans are just another way of financial doping.
One or two surprising names in there. Or perhaps not, given how they may benefit from the verdict.
I know its so wrong but I'm going to wank whilst I listen to Simon Jordan in the morning