Ducado
Well-Known Member
As long as they do it legally there won’t be a problem, the issue is doing it legallyI'm sure the PL will re-jig the rules again to suit the red cartel
As long as they do it legally there won’t be a problem, the issue is doing it legallyI'm sure the PL will re-jig the rules again to suit the red cartel
Think the biggest issue will be loan interest and will result in the rules entangling a whole bunch of clubs who will have to make some serious decisions on financing or rule changes. That is where I think this will have huge implications and more so if the rules as they are fall. Spurs have around a £billion in loans although I suspect they are all commercial , Everton were close on £500m of shareholder loans , Brighton £300 million , Arsenal you say £200m , Liverpool had £100m , Bournemouth £60m so should be interesting.
Arse Carbunkle more likeI didn't know Art Garfunkel was a Tarquin
As long as they do it legally there won’t be a problem, the issue is doing it legally
No they are just fucking thickWest Ham, Brentford, Fulham and wolves aren’t yank owned (afaik)
Why don’t they just broadcast the judges’ summary statement. It is clear and damning of the PL.No doubt Stone and Roan at the BBC will be desperately trying to find a way to paint this as a victory for the PL and their redshirt stooges, hence no proper analysis yet.
Cue "that" Gooners GIF showing how upset they are...BBC breaking news …. PL wins partial victory over the Stockport Oilers, reaction from the Emptyhad
View attachment 134245
But your accounts didn't show the interest that should have accrued on those interest free loans.For sure you don't apply penalties to rules that weren't in place at the time.