City launch legal action against the Premier League | Unconfirmed reports that City have secured "potentially significant victory" (p 808)

halfcenturyup said:
There are other rules in place to prevent clubs entering into crazy contracts on anything other than arm's length. These APT rules are completely unnecessary in reality, especially as there has never been a case of sponsorship that has been so out of line with fmv that it raised eyebrows (the nearest possibly being the original Etihad contract but that later turned out to be good value).
Click to expand...
The only recent sponsorship that was so out of line was Chevrolet with Man United!!!!
 
Hopefully we are pressing for damages for rules that were brought in purposely to stifle us

A lot of PL clubs are going to be pissed their revenues are being spent on the mistakes made by Masters to ingratiate himself with his Cartel Chums once they see the PL clawing back legal rebates from the central pot.
 
BLUE THUNDER said:
I don't buy this "hasn't been discussed" rubbish.
If the PL had a victory of any significance they or their leaking parasites (Arsenhole) would be shouting it from the rooftops.
Click to expand...
City is all they ever discuss.

A meeting with premier league clubs but nothing on city lol. Sky can do one, lying pricks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.