Sir Knives
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 May 2010
- Messages
- 66
wez99 said:Sir Knives said:You guys shouldn't get rid of Robinho, he's still an valuable asset.
Who are you?
An interested neutral.
wez99 said:Sir Knives said:You guys shouldn't get rid of Robinho, he's still an valuable asset.
Who are you?
Blue Dan said:Keep him. What's the worst that can happen?
Pigeonho said:Maybe so, but we'd have to pay £70m. They would get him for less than £50m though in my view, because they are one of the players, the big boys who people take seriously when it comes to major deals because they don't have to chuck daft wages/fees about because they are who they are. Thats by the by though, the point I was making is we have overpaid on probably all the deals we've made since the takeover, all bar Barry and Johnson i'd say, (that tells its own story with them being English). The others though, we will never recoup the fee back, not even close. Robinho should be sold if the bids reach £20m, thats my view on it anyway.Somud said:The rags will have to pay 50m to get Sneijder mate. At least.
Sir Knives said:You guys shouldn't get rid of Robinho, he's still an valuable asset.
This. Robinho will always be a fond memory.Balti said:He served his purpose and kick-started the revolution but found the going too tough after that. Recoup £20 mill + and say farewell.