BrianW
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Mar 2006
- Messages
- 5,888
- Team supported
- There's Only One City
I disagree completely with that. For most people down here a season ticket at spurs will work out at an average of £80-100 a month. For some people, that’s what they pay for Sky. Others spend that on cigs. Others on beer, weed, clubbing or sandwiches at lunchtime if they CBA making their own.
The crowd at Spurs isn’t made up exclusively of bankers and stockbrokers. It’s painters and decorators, van drivers, bakers, teachers, local government workers, electricians and shop workers. Same as ours, really. Most of them aren’t super rich, they do ordinary jobs and earn ordinary wages but just choose to prioritise going to Spurs above other things in their life. There are many others who don’t.
There’s a wider pool I grant you of potential people who will be willing to give up Sky etc so they can afford their match tickets for Spurs, because London is a big City and there is no real competition within a 50-100 mile radius, but there are also more clubs fighting to draw the punters in. Also, whilst average earnings are higher down here so is the cost of living, so that balances out.
I’m not saying ‘stop moaning’ or anything but the idea that London clubs have it easy because everyone here is loaded is miles off target.
Am I not right in thinking that Spurs will sell out their ground, even though their prices are generally pitched higher than City's?
You see, it's a supply and demand issue. My guess is that if City matched Spurs' pricing policy, we would nowhere near fill our ground. Obviously not everyone in London and the South East is well-off, but sufficient are to fill the grounds of teams like Spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea, who are reasonably successful and 'big', even though on average they charge more for seats.
Eighty to hundred notes a month is quite a lot, to be frank.