OK insert the word "decent" then. He's a weak link in this side, and has been for 18 months imho. As a forward player, in an attacking team he adds little, not even the odd goal.
Anyway back to the whole game, I don't get why people are happy that we've now dropped 6 points in our last 3 home games, and in each one it's the same 2 reasons, don't take numerous chances, and concede attacking f**king stupid goal.
It's no good keep saying it'll all be alright eventually, because it's costing us points, valuable points.
What gives you the right to post offensive and derogatory comments like this and calling posters knicker wetters simply for stating their opinion? unless you were watching the Saturday film and not at the match you would have seen a team come out for the second half not being prepared to put the same effort in as the first half. resorting to passing about at the back exactly as done before (Sunderland at home comes to mind) with disastrous results. lack of concentration, poor technical control and generall being complacent. you sound happy with that. other posters on here me included are not.
Kolerov and Stones did nothing wrong
We don't win a game and this forum is flooded with fuckwits. We should be used to it by now though.If you feel my post was derogatory and offensive then feel free to report it.
Blah, blah, blah....my opinion etc etc etc.
My opinion is that this forum is full of rags, wums, trolls and yes, knicker wetters as soon as we dont win.
My opinion!
I plain disagree with that assessment, 5 shots total they didn't really trouble us for most the game I don't know what you are counting as "chances" or "breaks", they are going to win the ball back at some point and try and break we can't count every instance of that as a "chance". I think you are being to generous to them personally, it was more about what we didn't do as I said but the end result is we dropped 2 points whether you think it was harsh or deserved we should just move on.I disagree that you can't control the tempo with minority possession or perhaps a better phrase would have been 'heavily influenced the tempo'. If you press us, like 'Boro did, then it still forces us to play at a pace we were uncomfortable with. We wanted to stroll and they wanted higher tempo, and caused it (imo). Whenever we did give the ball away, they were poised to play long ball and get in behind us. They squandered a handful of good breaks as a result of not being a clinical counter attacking team, but in the end, they managed to complete the job and grab a goal.
Depends on what you call 'deserve'. Obviously, we're the better footballing side, and had the lion's share of possession and chances, but at the same time, they defended pretty well, and Valdes made a great save. They almost lobbed Bravo too - which was definitely going it had Bravo not scrambled back successfully. If I were managing 'Boro, I'd say they deserved a point based on their resilience and talking that final chance when it came - but it's a moot point really.
Today showed our lack of firepower up front. You won't win the league with Aguero and Kelechi as your forward line in the long run as there will be many more games like that. Gabirel Jesus cannot come quick enough.
aI'm loving the juxtaposition of the word 'coherent' with the conspicuous absence of a full stop after '4'. Nice work fellah.
here here brotherIf you feel my post was derogatory and offensive then feel free to report it.
Blah, blah, blah....my opinion etc etc etc.
My opinion is that this forum is full of rags, wums, trolls and yes, knicker wetters as soon as we dont win.
My opinion!