City v PL | Legal Dispute/Appeal

I'm not sure.
The Etisalat sponsorship for 2013/14 fell outside of the UEFA action but falls within the introduction of PL's FFP.
@Prestwich_Blue?
I seriously doubt that FFP is relevant to this case in any way. It pre-dates the Der Spiegel/CAS stuff. PL's Rule J7(?) is about supplying false financial statements to support licensing. Quite simply it's been proven we didn't do that.

The time-barring was always a red herring as UEFA had already accepted that the Etisalat sponsorship, despite initially coming from ADUG, had been paid back to them by Etisalat.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.