I don't think so mate. I said yesterday on here that some (perhaps all even) of those time-barred charges pre-date the introduction of the PL's own version of FFP
I can’t immediately recall where but I read an article commenting on the CAS ruling and it suggested that the time barring in the UEFA case wasn’t mirrored in the PL version.
My guess is that it revolves around this
“In the Football League and UEFA regulations there are provisions to combat accusations of companies which have connections to the club from providing the club with an artificially high sponsorship deal. The UEFA regulations make reference to the test being “fair value” for assessing the value of the contract. Interestingly, the PL are using a “Fair Market Value” test (Rule A.1.32)