City v Sporting Kansas City 23rd July

[SebastianBlue]

Actually thought Fernando did well.

Ye I enjoyed watching Fernando tonight looked the real deal in parts. Iheanacho tho.... Wow what a night for the 17 year old absolutely buzzing he got his goal well deserved. Zucalini was also good put himself about and isn't afraid.In all it was a good game we looked decent going forward Kolarov with his deadly crosses.

Just goes to show the varying opinions. I watched him closely and thought he had a relatively poor match (for reasons already posted). But, as I said, it's early days.

Absolutely agree about Iheanacho and Zuculini, though.

 

[SebastianBlue]

It was actually Richards, just look before spouting nonsense

First, BT Sport's coverage did not show an "offside" camera angle until well after the goal, so no one knew it was the slow stroll back, hence my edit from the initial viewing (and your nonsense).

Second, are you absolutely sure?

100% sure, when they showed it side on the commentator said it was Boyata but he was mistaken as he was in red boots so it was Richards, hmmm but your edit was wrong?

The edit was well after for reason posted above, so not sure what you're on about.

And I'll take your word for it mate, though, have no idea why you are acting a rag about it.

 

[pudge]

[bigimg]https://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/861272175.gif?1406164692[/bigimg]

[bigimg]https://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/861274615.gif?1406167191[/bigimg]

[bigimg]https://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/861277262.gif?1406169883[/bigimg]

[bigimg]https://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/861278328.gif?1406170834[/bigimg]

 

[kippaxchris]

First, BT Sport's coverage did not show an "offside" camera angle until well after the goal, so no one knew it was the slow stroll back, hence my edit from the initial viewing (and your nonsense).

Second, are you absolutely sure?

100% sure, when they showed it side on the commentator said it was Boyata but he was mistaken as he was in red boots so it was Richards, hmmm but your edit was wrong?

The edit was well after for reason posted above, so not sure what you're on about.

And I'll take your word for it mate, though, have no idea why you are acting a rag about it.

It's not hard, you blamed Kolarov for the onside then Boyata in the correction when in actual fact it was Richards! What's so hard to understand? As for acting a rag? Where on earth have you pulled that from I only corrected your correction it's not a big deal

 

[abellwillring]

Bad defending from Kolarov there for the goal.

Actually, on second replay! it was Boyata that played Sapong on, as he was just jogging back to the offside line.

It was actually Richards, just look before spouting nonsense

First, BT Sport's coverage did not show an "offside" camera angle until well after the goal, so no one knew it was the slow stroll back, hence my edit from the initial viewing (and your nonsense).

Second, are you absolutely sure?

It was Richards. The slow stroll was clearly coming from the defender closest to the camera in the right back position. He was a solid 5 yards behind the back line.

What a game by Iheanacho. Also want to give praise to Navas and Scott Sinclair. Sinclair honestly has played quite well in the friendlies. Somewhat curious if we end up trying to keep him around..

 

[SebastianBlue]

[bigimg]https://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/861272175.gif?1406164692[/bigimg]

[bigimg]https://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/861274615.gif?1406167191[/bigimg]

[bigimg]https://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/861277262.gif?1406169883[/bigimg]

[bigimg]https://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/861278328.gif?1406170834[/bigimg]

Well done.

A generally great performance.

 

[SebastianBlue]

It was actually Richards, just look before spouting nonsense

First, BT Sport's coverage did not show an "offside" camera angle until well after the goal, so no one knew it was the slow stroll back, hence my edit from the initial viewing (and your nonsense).

Second, are you absolutely sure?

It was Richards. The slow stroll was clearly coming from the defender closest to the camera in the right back position. He was a solid 5 yards behind the back line.

What a game by Iheanacho. Also want to give praise to Navas and Scott Sinclair. Sinclair honestly has played quite well in the friendlies. Somewhat curious if we end up trying to keep him around..

Fair enough. The only reason Boyata made sense at the time was that he had been going out wide quite a bit and letting Richards make the recovering run (as Richards was getting forward often). I can think of at least three or four times Richards actually made a tackle off Saad or others after they beat Boyata out on the right.

Also, I agree about Navas but wasn't that impressed with Sinclair. Not a bad performance, by any means, and he won the penalty, but I just found his general player underwhelming. He had a tendency to dwell on the ball too long for me.

 

[Instant_Offense]

Actually thought Fernando did well.

No idea how you saw this. Quiet would be a generous description.

 

[Instant_Offense]

Just been reading some of the other posts and it's great to see so many City supporters over here. It would have been really great if some of these Guiness tourement games could have been in Atlanta but the closest is DC where the Rags play and I wouldn't walk across the road to see that lot. Oh, well, it's great to see City play in the evening instead of having to get up way too early for the early EPL game.

Meeting folks in Knoxville to go up to Pittsburgh myself.

 

[SebastianBlue]

100% sure, when they showed it side on the commentator said it was Boyata but he was mistaken as he was in red boots so it was Richards, hmmm but your edit was wrong?

The edit was well after for reason posted above, so not sure what you're on about.

And I'll take your word for it mate, though, have no idea why you are acting a rag about it.

It's not hard, you blamed Kolarov for the onside then Boyata in the correction when in actual fact it was Richards! What's so hard to understand? As for acting a rag? Where on earth have you pulled that from I only corrected your correction it's not a big deal

Then why go on as you have? You could have just said "No mate, it was Richards." Instead you said I was talking nonsense and then went on about my correction after the fact.

I don't have trouble understanding what you said or taking a correction, but you are acting a right knob about it, which I have trouble with.

How about you put yours away and we act like fellow blues?