City Vs Reading Pre match Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
cibaman said:
skelpomike said:
Tevez and Aguero to start please, as many games as possible together in the lead up to the business end of the season!
Click to expand...

The chances of Mancini picking Tevez and Aguero to start all 4 games between 22nd Dec and 1st Jan must be somewhere between 0% and 10%.

I'd rather see them start in the two away games.
Click to expand...
Dzeko and Balotelli just don't seem reliable right now though.
 
Rumours are that Balotelli himself stopped the legal case as he wants to prove himself and make a career at City.

Can see him starting v Reading if he has been training well this week.
 
CTID101 said:
Rumours are that Balotelli himself stopped the legal case as he wants to prove himself and make a career at City.

Can see him starting v Reading if he has been training well this week.
Click to expand...

Like this 'rumour' in the Independent.........



Manchester City’s Mario Balotelli has backed down from his decision to challenge a £340,000 club fine at a Premier League tribunal, in a final attempt to salvage his career at the club.


The Italian’s agent, Mino Raiola, said last night that the 22-year-old was determined to fix things with manager Roberto Mancini and a City coaching staff who are increasingly sceptical about the manager’s faith in him. But Balotelli’s career prospects at the club are hanging by a thread and the striker was persuaded that they would have been damaged irreparably had he allowed a QC to proceed yesterday with an appeal against the club’s decision to fine him two weeks’ wages.

It is understood that the change of heart, which came as the player’s Italian lawyers prepared to present his case to the London tribunal, was not a result of an 11th-hour intervention from Mancini, who has not been closely following the latest Balotelli controversy as it has played out. Instead, it was the Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) who made it clear that bringing the case and winning it could have severe ramifications for him. It is understood that the substantial legal costs racked up by a case involving solicitors and barristers are to be met equally by player and club.

The PFA believed that Balotelli would have won the case against City, who went outside of disciplinary guidelines to claim that the player was in breach of contract last season because of his general disciplinary record. The guidelines only allow a player to be fined if he receives a sequence of yellow or red cards for either dissent or violent conduct, rather than a general sequence of cards. The players’ union made it clear to Balotelli that the accumulation of disciplinary points for those two proscribed offences would have entitled City to charge him more than two weeks’ wages, if they used the disciplinary guidelines as and when he committed those offences in the 2011-12 campaign. This argument might have been offered by City’s QC, if the case had proceeded.

City are vindicated for their punishment of a player who has brought their club into disrepute and missed 21.7 per cent of last season’s games through suspension. But it is understood that the PFA has pointed out to the club that they would be far better served operating within the guidelines agreed between the PFA, clubs and the Premier League, rather than going outside of those parameters, as they have in the cases of Balotelli and Carlos Tevez.

A joint statement issued between the club and his representatives was notable for Balotelli’s assertion that he had stood down “as a sign of respect for Roberto Mancini” – now his only ally at City. “After amicable talks between the parties, as a sign of respect for Roberto Mancini, the supporters and the club, Mario Balotelli has chosen to accept a two-week fine levied upon him by the club and withdraw his disciplinary appeal, which was due to be heard by a Premier League panel,” the statement read. “Mario remains available for selection for all forthcoming fixtures.”

Although the feeling in Italy is that Milan may seek to capitalise on the uncertainty surrounding Balotelli by making a low bid for him in January, the Serie A side may need to jettison either Robinho or Alexandre Pato. The Milan vice-president, Adriano Galliani, has confirmed that the club have received a bid for Pato, although he says he is keen to keep Robinho.

Raiola said yesterday: “Mario is committed to City. He doesn’t want to leave the club. He’s always wanted to stay and this [case] hasn’t changed this. He is committed in Manchester.”

With Mancini not even considering Balotelli for the side to play at Reading in two days’ time, he is also preparing to go through the Christmas period without Samir Nasri, who is expected to be out for two weeks with a groin injury suffered in last Saturday’s win at Newcastle United.
 
Looking unlikely that Balotelli will be available for Reading - if he's missed training with illness.

Dezko in line for a start. Can't play Tev and Aguero every game over Xmas and beyond
 
Shame that Samir looks like he will miss the Christmas period. After he went off against Newcastle we were a different team and Newcastle came into it.

Is Jimmy back?

Is this the chance for Sinclair though? Or will he push Ya Ya further forward and bring in Gaz Baz?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.