Clichy

[jellert]

We are not talking much about him. When he was playing for Arsenal i didn't rate him.

Yesterday he was playing oustanding. Just wanted to say that.....

 

[Jumanji]

He wasn't even bad at Arsenal. He was the scapegoat for a poor back line.

He wasn't great at the offside trap though. That system really didn't suit him. When he played Villa onside in the CL, I think the Arse fans had had enough.<br /><br />-- Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:34 am --<br /><br />

Yesterday he was playing oustanding. Just wanted to say that.....

I agree. They never got a sniff on his side.

 

[The Fat el Hombre]

Very good player. Was considered one of the best full backs in the league for a while before his form tailed off. His electric pace is a great asset that gets him out of trouble and his composure at times is excellent (though he fucked it up near the end last night)

anyone see the disagreement between him PLatt and Mancini when we were 1 nil down? (Sorry to be negative)

 

[BibbyBlue85]

Absolute quality!

 

[dxb-blue]

Was excellent yesterday

Only really been done over by Danniel Sturridge this season ...very surprised Chelsea Manager missed this point as it could have cause us some problems

 

[Jumanji]

anyone see the disagreement between him PLatt and Mancini when we were 1 nil down? (Sorry to be negative)

Didn't notice. What happened?

 

[M24-CRC]

He wasn't even bad at Arsenal. He was the scapegoat for a poor back line.

He wasn't great at the offside trap though. That system really didn't suit him. When he played Villa onside in the CL, I think the Arse fans had had enough.

-- Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:34 am --

Yesterday he was playing oustanding. Just wanted to say that.....

I agree. They never got a sniff on his side.

Are you serious????

All of chelseas best attacks (albeit not many) in the first half came down our left side with Ramires.......Clichy seems to escape much criticism because most seem to prefer him to Kolarov

 

[Jumanji]

He wasn't even bad at Arsenal. He was the scapegoat for a poor back line.

He wasn't great at the offside trap though. That system really didn't suit him. When he played Villa onside in the CL, I think the Arse fans had had enough.

-- Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:34 am --

Yesterday he was playing oustanding. Just wanted to say that.....

I agree. They never got a sniff on his side.

Are you serious????

All of chelseas best attacks (albeit not many) in the first half came down our left side with Ramires.......Clichy seems to escape much criticism because most seem to prefer him to Kolarov

All Ramires did was run at Clichy.

 

[simonr555]

He did okay last night. Much better when we went 1-0 down and chased the game. I still think teams get in behind him too often and he somehow escapes criticism for never closing the man down, whereas Kolarov gets slaughtered for it. His pace gets him out of the shit a hell of a lot of the time. It's also got to be said that his crossing is absolutely woeful.

 

[M24-CRC]

He wasn't even bad at Arsenal. He was the scapegoat for a poor back line.

He wasn't great at the offside trap though. That system really didn't suit him. When he played Villa onside in the CL, I think the Arse fans had had enough.

-- Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:34 am --


I agree. They never got a sniff on his side.

Are you serious????

All of chelseas best attacks (albeit not many) in the first half came down our left side with Ramires.......Clichy seems to escape much criticism because most seem to prefer him to Kolarov

All Ramires did was run at Clichy.

and got past him a few times.....<br /><br />-- Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:41 am --<br /><br />

He did okay last night. Much better when we went 1-0 down and chased the game. I still think teams get in behind him too often and he somehow escapes criticism for never closing the man down, whereas Kolarov gets slaughtered for it. His pace gets him out of the shit a hell of a lot of the time. It's also got to be said that his crossing is absolutely woeful.

absolutely spot on