kas_tippler
Well-Known Member
No you're being stupid agian. You started the argument.
Yes I am being stupid and no I have discussions, other people want to argue with me.
No you're being stupid agian. You started the argument.
In that case why are wood chip burners considered an acceptable environmental way of producing energy?One other reply to an earlier comment about a burning a tree being the same CO2 output as natural decay. Sorry to say, but this is nonsense! In simple terms, burning a tree releases as CO2 all the carbon that has been captured by that tree throughout its lifetime in one go; a decaying tree however keeps much of the carbon locked up for a far longer period. Some of the carbon is not released at all as it remains locked up in other organisms that feed off the decaying plant such as fungi or insects, keeping the carbon part of complex molecules that enter the foodchain.
That hits the nail on the head. There is a huge amount of political- and corporate weight behind the scepticism on climate change because the pay-offs from ignoring the issue are short-term, which benefits politicians (they get re-elected) and corporations (they make more money). Doing something about it only benefits the next generation.
zzzzzzzz...........In that case why are wood chip burners considered an acceptable environmental way of producing energy?
They argue with you because you're acting like an arsehole mate. That's the truth.Yes I am being stupid and no I have discussions, other people want to argue with me.
I didn't ask you *yawn*zzzzzzzz...........
Google it mate.
I am dyslexic.
Its no laughing matter, you try and go through the education system without knowing how to spell, read, write and process information properly. Being called stupid and lazy. Yes pathetic indeed.Pathetic.
I suppose being called pathetic for being dyslexic is an acceptable argument.They argue with you because you're acting like an arsehole mate. That's the truth.