Climate Change is here and man made

Why the fuck would i?
You had the chance to discuss the subject like an adult yesterday but came back with a reply i'd expect from a 10 year old.
But you're never up for a discussion, always confrontation, anger and argument. F'ing this bollocks that, it's a modern trend to speak to someone on forums etc differently than you would in real life.
 
I started climate change?!


97bc4a7e308fece778d14cb0d524bd24.gif
 
Plots of time series of globally and regionally averaged time series of temperature anomaly for each dataset can be viewed using a time series browse tool. Several examples of the plots available are shown below.

Figure 5. Globally averaged temperature anomaly time series for the Lower Tropospheric Temperature (TLT). The plot shows the warming ot the troposphere over the last 3 decades which has been attributed to human-caused global warming. (Click on the figure to go to the time series browse tool.)

Figure 6. Globally averaged temperature anomaly time series for the Lower Tropospheric Stratosphere (TLS). The plot shows the cooling of the lower stratosphere over the past 3 decades. This cooling is caused by a combination of ozone depletion and the increase of greenhouse gases. During the most recent decade, the rate of cooling has reduced substantially. (Click on the figure to go to the time series browse tool.)

Might as well have a few more non photoshopped ones
Are these the graphs that Piers Corbyn claims are just propaganda based on bogus satellite data?
 
The original poster of the graph posted it in response to me saying the measurements for warming should be taken from the start of the industrial revolution. Clearly the graph is about 200 years short, and irrelevant to the point i was making.

It's not 200 years short, and it IS relevant to the point you were making.

If you look at global CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels:

global-co2-emmisions.jpg



Global CO2 from fossil-fuel emissions by source:
global-total.jpg



And cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels:

cumulative_global_1751_2007.jpg



You can see that anthropogenic CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels did not become potentially consequential factor until approximately 1950, and then grew rapidly thereafter. Per the Economist, “The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO₂ put there by humanity since 1750. And yet, as James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, observes, ‘the five-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade.’”

The large increase in anthropogenic CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels since 1950 is quite clear in this global per capita carbon emissions graph:


global_fossil_carbon_per_capita_google_chart.jpg




It's apparent that the majority of the increase occurred after 1950, and the change between 1900 and 1950 was de minimis. The graph I posted demonstrated that one-third of man’s entire influence on climate since the Industrial Revolution has occurred since February 1997, yet the 225 months since then show no global warming at all.

The whole climate change scare is nothing but a political scam. In 1975, the National Academy of Sciences published this graph and warned of dramatic global COOLING.

screenhunter_1213-oct-02-16-51.jpg


screenhunter_02-mar-15-21-22.gif

702216495.png


The National Science Foundation warned of the same thing.

screenhunter_979-sep-26-22-41.jpg

screenhunter_980-sep-26-22-41.jpg

screenhunter_981-sep-26-22-42.jpg


Never mind the actual history of the planet. The IPCC has a dirty job to do and has wiped out most of 20th century history with this graph, that shows no 1940s warmth and no 1970s global cooling scare. There is no “ominous world-wide cooling” shown in the IPCC graph from 1953 to 1973:

screenhunter_1216-oct-02-16-59.jpg



The next graph overlays the IPCC graph in red on the 1975 National Academy of Sciences graph at the same scale. Our scumbag friends have knocked half a degree off most of the 20th century.

screenhunter_1215-oct-02-16-57.jpg


They will protest that the NAS graph is just for the Northern Hemisphere, trying to make the absurd case that from 1890 to 1910 the NH was warming rapidly while the SH was cooling even faster. Polarity divergence like that can’t happen, because both hemispheres are driven by ENSO.

Also note that the (scam) artist who created the IPCC graph forgot to put in the late 1930s peak.

The IPCC in conjunction with NASA and NOAA has completely rewritten Earth’s history, because they are criminally minded political organizations, not scientific ones.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.