stonerblue
Well-Known Member
I see you completely misunderstood my point
Not sure how IB?
I see you completely misunderstood my point
If they don't come up with the required results they'll loose funding, its an industry.
It simply IS! All of the data sets except for the new NOAA/NCDC data set show a hiatus (with NASA LOTI being the other data set coming closest to not showing a hiatus). I suggest you read this: http://judithcurry.com/2015/11/06/hiatus-controversy-show-me-the-data/
I've been above my average height for the past 540 months. Using your logic that means I am getting taller.
I've listened to the 'facts' from both sides of the argument. NASA scientists, profs from universities, metrology experts, charity workers in devolving countries, politicians, even Piers Corbyn! The conclusion that I have come to is that man made climate change isn't happening, natural climate change is happening all the time and there's no disputing it.Once again you completely ignore the facts and spout more un-informed rubbish due to a lack of basic knowledge on the subject
Not sure how IB?
There is a well-respected school of thought doing the rounds (for quite some time too) that the notion of man-made climate change has been propagated by large US and European multinationals in order to limit and slow the industrial growth of developing nations. This appears to be through a concern of losing market share and influence, sparked by the rise of lower-cost Chinese and Indian products. Ergo, if the developing world can be convinced that they are responsible for polluting the environment, and restrictions can be put in place to limit and control their growth, the established business powers can maintain the status quo to a larger extent than if the developing nations' economies were allowed to grow unchecked. The stronger their economies become, the weaker the established ones will then be.
It's interesting, but doesn't really say anything new.
The most important aspect of this is that all the data sets are surface temperature...
... which accounts for a very tiny proportion of the planet's heat sink.
Even then, the article shows that the same data could be interpreted in many different ways, with one end of the spectrum being the increase continues unchanged, the other end being that there has been no increase.
One of the grpahs I posted shows deep sea temperatures (where the enormous majority of the globe's heat-mass lies), which show not one tiny bit of a hiatus!
haha! funny! of course you have got taller since you were your average height.
Spoilsport! I haven't even asked any of the climate change deniers if they also deny evolution by natural selection yet...
Ten minutes research shows that global warming, er sorry, man made climate change is complete bollocks