Club Badge (merged)

[RichardDunneOwnGoal]

to be honest i dont see the reason of a new crest if its not going to be inline with the CFG branding ... but thats me being cynical lol

No I agree, it's definitely a motive for the club.

Let's say in theory if our most popular old crest was a hexagon with a scroll around the bottom, I doubt the club would endorse it.

One of the primary reasons this has come up is because our old crests are circular and very popular, and the club knows its goal for having similar crests for all the 'CFG' is more or less inline with what the fans want.

That's why we have to make sure that our crest stays true to Manchester City, and isnt some generic piece of crap intended to fit nicely next to a tinpot club that's only just been formed for example.

 

[GeekinGav]

Hi Gav. Great work. How do I upload an image please? Been trying for 3 hours. :'(

to here .... could be wrong, but think you can only link to n offsite image ....

if you have twitter or facebook or instagram etc, upload it there,

right click on it when its on and should say something like copy image address that will copy the link to the clipboard

then come on here in the post box look for a symbol with a picture frame, then pless Ctrl and V or Cmd and V to paste the link into the pop up box, please enter and the image should be dispayed in the post ...

then submit yuour post ...

thats bascically what i do lol

 

[GeekinGav]

No I agree, it's definitely a motive for the club.

Let's say in theory if our most popular old crest was a hexagon with a scroll around the bottom, I doubt the club would endorse it.

One of the primary reasons this has come up is because our old crests are circular and very popular, and the club knows its goal for having similar crests for all the 'CFG' is more or less inline with what the fans want.

That's why we have to make sure that our crest stays true to Manchester City, and isnt some generic piece of crap intended to fit nicely next to a tinpot club that's only just been formed for example.

i agree .. i think it was just a coincidence or maybe a future plan to have all the CFG badges circular. ... i dont understand why they didnt do this when they rebranded Melbourne Heart and i think its no cocidence its been announced after the recent "good news" profit announcemrnt that the club is successfully growing globally ....

cynical .... told ya lol

 

[kippaxkid74]

Yeah, that's what I'm particularly hating though mate.

Fuck the CFG. Not interested. Our heritage shouldn't be dictated to in order to fit into some generic template for some tin pot clubs on the other side of the globe.

We have our club colours, and Navy blue shouldn't be in there, IMO.

No I agree, it's definitely a motive for the club.

Let's say in theory if our most popular old crest was a hexagon with a scroll around the bottom, I doubt the club would endorse it.

One of the primary reasons this has come up is because our old crests are circular and very popular, and the club knows its goal for having similar crests for all the 'CFG' is more or less inline with what the fans want.

That's why we have to make sure that our crest stays true to Manchester City, and isnt some generic piece of crap intended to fit nicely next to a tinpot club that's only just been formed for example.

Agree with you - i worry it's going to be too similar to the others in "city group".. and loads of fans mock ups already use pretty much the navy blue circle style like the other clubs. I don't want us to look almost the same as the rest, as much as to the bosses we are a part of 4... surely even they know we're the big part, the unique part, the part with history and a fan base and trophies to win that actually mean something. You can't just make a badge neatly look like the rest of the "brand". Which is why if we change, should be pretty much like the old (ie 70s to 90s) badge - black edging, white inside the cicrles, black writing etc etc with yellow and red. Pretty much the old badge with either the rose or red and yellow lines. Don't make us look like we're just a part of "city group"... however i worry that's exactly where we're heading - and all these fan mock ups don't help, can't they see they look like nyc or melbourne??!

 

[GeekinGav]

thats why i did the 'tale of four cities' image when i heard about Yokohama as a what i invisioned was the plan...(if/when we increase the yokohama stake or nissan agree to merge it with CFG)

but i'll go one step further an bet they will all have the sky blue band on the outer. did our white as some hope of uniqueness and kept Yokohama blue as we dont own them really.

 

[kippaxkid74]

I agree the outer circle.should be white with black piping inner should be the manchester shield in it's proper colours (red and gold all this no red bollocks is a bit silly it's he colour of the shield) the background should be sky blue roses or bees optional. Forget the eagle n stars and the navy blue needs to be toned down

Yep this or this...

 

[M147WN]

Sorry! Only just seen this about the new badge.
Can someone please tell me what CFG is?

Would love the old circular, 3 stripes(rivers).
Ship.
Nod to St.Marks would be good. Maltese cross?
No Lancs rose.
Manchester City Football Club.
Sky Blue, white & maroon.

 

[RichardDunneOwnGoal]

Agree with you - i worry it's going to be too similar to the others in "city group".. and loads of fans mock ups already use pretty much the navy blue circle style like the other clubs. I don't want us to look almost the same as the rest, as much as to the bosses we are a part of 4... surely even they know we're the big part, the unique part, the part with history and a fan base and trophies to win that actually mean something. You can't just make a badge neatly look like the rest of the "brand". Which is why if we change, should be pretty much like the old (ie 70s to 90s) badge - black edging, white inside the cicrles, black writing etc etc with yellow and red. Pretty much the old badge with either the rose or red and yellow lines. Don't make us look like we're just a part of "city group"... however i worry that's exactly where we're heading - and all these fan mock ups don't help, can't they see they look like nyc or melbourne??!

Agree, completely.

No Navy blue is a must as far as I'm concerned.

 

[GeekinGav]

Sorry! Only just seen this about the new badge.
Can someone please tell me what CFG is?

Would love the old circular, 3 stripes(rivers).
Ship.
Nod to St.Marks would be good. Maltese cross?
No Lancs rose.
Manchester City Football Club.
Sky Blue, white & maroon.

CFG is City Football Group .. which is basically the parent company/umbrella that all the clubs are under. City, NYCFC, Melbourne City and Yokohama (dont own them completely yet)

 

[Kippax.]