Cole Palmer

When he put the guy on his ass, it was a thing of beauty.

Looks a player, whether we keep him or put him on loan we should not sell him.
 
He has it all in his hands now, up to him if he wants to stay and fight for a spot - still needs to work on his play without the ball but no doubt he is a big talent and there is no way 30m buys him after the last couple of performances - we'd be mad to do that. Only way I see him leaving is if he has a season loan to facilitate West Ham selling us a certain Brazilian.
 
Still think he could.do with a loan, but we shouldn't be selling him

The paqueta deal still makes no sense to me, especially if it meant losing Palmer on a permanent deal

I'm surely in the minority, but after treble this is a great season to give the highly rated youth a chance instead of bidding upwards of £60mil on players who don't make our best XI
 
handsofstone said:
Still think he could.do with a loan, but we shouldn't be selling him

The paqueta deal still makes no sense to me, especially if it meant losing Palmer on a permanent deal

I'm surely in the minority, but after treble this is a great season to give the highly rated youth a chance instead of bidding upwards of £60mil on players who don't make our best XI
Click to expand...

I don’t think you are in the minority. I think most city fans would rather see a talented local lad given a chance over a ready made replacement.

It’s mainly on the transfer forum where posters always want the next shiny new objects
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.