So you're not a City fan now if you regret us selling an academy graduate that is both exactly the type of player we are crying out for and genuinly setting the league on fire?Love coming on here to see the majority of none city fans who keep posting on here that we shouldn't have sold him should have had a buy back it's biggest cock up ever!
Bet Chelsea last forum ain't full of "what a cock up selling Kdb and Salah was"
Love coming on here to see the majority of none city fans who keep posting on here that we shouldn't have sold him should have had a buy back it's biggest cock up ever!
Bet Chelsea last forum ain't full of "what a cock up selling Kdb and Salah was"
Disagree completely. As of right now he'd be better than any of our wide/playmaking options bar Phil. And given Kev is made of glass, the decision to sell him is now certifiable.I still think the £12 million nett we paid for Doku makes Palmer's sale a no-brainer.
He’s not a winger, and our central midfield was already stocked with better players than him.
It was the best outcome for all parties.
Did we not insert a buyback? What the actual fuck were we thinking?
No way would Chelsea have accepted a buy back.Will love to insert them for any old middling talent doing the rounds through the academy, but not when the player is more than decent it seems
Chelsea probably refused, and Palmer probably only wanted Chelsea when they showed interest.Will love to insert them for any old middling talent doing the rounds through the academy, but not when the player is more than decent it seems
Palmer himself didn’t want to go on loanI can't understand why they refused to let him go on loan. It makes zero sense.