He was obviously sensational for City based on what everyone here says, his videos, and just generally how revered he is, but just been doing a little reading about his international career. I didn't realise it was he who came on for Charlton in 1970 vs the West Germans. I had heard the story of Chartlon being subbed off but didn't realise it was Bell who came on for him. Apparently he played well, created some chances and should have had a penalty, but the substitution was unfairly blamed for the comeback when in actual fact it was far more to do with Banks being ill in goal and being replaced by Bonetti. Did the cunts in the media really blame that substitution even though he did well when he came on and the West Germans had already started their comeback anyway?
Apparently he got 48 caps for England. That is a respectable amount, but a player of his quality should have got more. This was in the days before loads of dumb friendlies though. When you think that Beckham, a player with a third of Bell's talent but 100 times his fame and hype, has won like 125 it really does make a mockery of football. There is no justice. Bell seems to have been underhyped and much much better than lots of modern prima donnas who think they're superstars after one good game. He is a major loss to football.