PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
it's history.People just need to accept that slavery is part of 'white'' history and not keep pushing it away as black history.
it's history.People just need to accept that slavery is part of 'white'' history and not keep pushing it away as black history.
When Johnson was the option for PM in the 2019 GE, the Tories gained fewer votes than the Green Party did (Tories 304,402 up on 2017; Greens 339,078). And in the 2017 GE it wasn’t Johnson that was voted in, he took over during the term.If this country didn't have a Race Problem would Boris Johnson be Prime Minister?
Just as there’s a history of white people being enslaved, as well as black people enslaving other black people. Slavery is a part of every races’ history.People just need to accept that slavery is part of 'white'' history and not keep pushing it away as black history.
He wouldn't be anywhere near the job if he was pulled up for his racist news coloumns if there wasn't a race issue.When Johnson was the option for PM in the 2019 GE, the Tories gained fewer votes than the Green Party did (Tories 304,402 up on 2017; Greens 339,078). And in the 2017 GE it wasn’t Johnson that was voted in, he took over during the term.
I’d say a “race problem” has nothing to do with why Johnson is PM.
Ash with her Alternative Race Report...
‘I always find it funny when people accuse me of hating Britain. I mean, there's no other country on this earth capable of producing someone as obnoxious as me.’
Well yeah, but those other examples of slavery are not part of our history. We should teach our history with slavery rather than Arabic slavery for the same reason that we teach about the kings and queens of England but not the emperors of China.Just as there’s a history of white people being enslaved, as well as black people enslaving other black people. Slavery is a part of every races’ history.
Guardian claiming that the ‘independent’ report was rewritten by Downing Street. This part from the article...
‘You can see that in the inconsistency of the ideas and data it presents and the conclusions it makes. That end product is the work of very different views.”
This was my first impression on the report when reading it (my post 31st March). I am still surprised that they allowed the report to be published when even in an initial skim read you could spot the inconsistencies.
Downing Street rewrote ‘independent’ report on race, experts claim
Commissioners allege No 10 distorted their work on inequality, after conclusions played down institutional racismwww.theguardian.com