Coppers-again

[bluetom]

Bunch of dickheads lookin for some "sport". Just looking for fight didnt see any reasons for the arrests. Smug shits.

The edl came across like they're all fritzl's sporn born to different daughters and the protest was some sort of family reunion. Neandrathal get together.

 

[clarkie_ni]

thing is do the people protesting ever think they will actually change anything?
i know most of the people protesting have pointless lives and must have a fuck load of time to organise and go to these demos, then have the ignorance to chant 'what a waste of money' at the police when its them that sit on their holes claiming benefits! YCMIU
the people in government who make the decisions go to work everyday probably not even knowing a recent demo has taken place!
which begs the question.......... is it worth going to a demo, gettin nicked, getting a criminal record all over something that will never change??

 

[brooklandsblue2.0]

UAF are even bigger dickheads than the EDL! didnt realise untill watching this

Anyone who has researched this has known what a vile, violent organisation UAF are/always have been for many years. However, if you say this you get called a waaacist by the libs.

 

[Glazers_Wallet]

UAF are even bigger dickheads than the EDL! didnt realise untill watching this

Anyone who has researched this has known what a vile, violent organisation UAF are/always have been for many years. However, if you say this you get called a waaacist by the libs.

every1 knows the uaf are scum. bunch of hippies and do gooders, can't be doing with them.

 

[bluetom]

Anyone who has researched this has known what a vile, violent organisation UAF are/always have been for many years. However, if you say this you get called a waaacist by the libs.

What's your evidence that theyre a "vile" "violent" organisation?

I mean the Edl obviously fit the two descriptions, as theyre members include bnp activists, combat18 activists and hooligans. I think everyone can agree that they fit the "vile" and "violent" criteria. But what about Uaf, what makes them "vile" and "violent" specifically? I've tried to do some research but couldnt find owt.

 

[brooklandsblue2.0]

Anyone who has researched this has known what a vile, violent organisation UAF are/always have been for many years. However, if you say this you get called a waaacist by the libs.

What's your evidence that theyre a "vile" "violent" organisation?

I mean the Edl obviously fit the two descriptions, as theyre members include bnp activists, combat18 activists and hooligans. I think everyone can agree that they fit the "vile" and "violent" criteria. But what about Uaf, what makes them "vile" and "violent" specifically? I've tried to do some research but couldnt find owt.

What you describe the Noonans as violent and vile? Do some research my liitle friend.

 

[bluetom]

What you describe the Noonans as violent and vile? Do some research my liitle friend.

Is that a no then?

 

[BluePurgatory]

What you describe the Noonans as violent and vile? Do some research my liitle friend.

Is that a no then?

I think what BB is trying to say is that the noonans were members of the UAF and dont exactly represent pillors of society. And before any one starts I am sure the EDL also have its fare share of gangsters, drug dealers etc. I watch Cops last night and I have to be honest all three sides had its thugs and hooligans. The worse were the cops.!

 

[brooklandsblue2.0]

Is that a no then?

I think what BB is trying to say is that the noonans were members of the UAF and dont exactly represent pillors of society. And before any one starts I am sure the EDL also have its fare share of gangsters, drug dealers etc. I watch Cops last night and I have to be honest all three sides had its thugs and hooligans. The worse were the cops.!

I never denied EDL didn't have its fair share of 'wronguns' in its rank, so you are correct there.

The point which I made and owned Bluetom over was the one you made above. So Tommy, hows that for you? pmsl.

 

[bluetom]

I never denied EDL didn't have its fair share of 'wronguns' in its rank, so you are correct there.

The point which I made and owned Bluetom over was the one you made above. So Tommy, hows that for you? pmsl.

still a no then. I gotta start making my point that way. I could say anything was vile and violent and then provide absolutely nothin to back it up!!