B
B
BLUEMATT23
Guest
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.How?
I have heard that from a number of people.
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.How?
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.
I have heard that from a number of people.
I’d heard people in Wuhan had covid like symptoms around Sept 2019 but hadn’t heard about Barcelona pre Sept…will look into it.Im not ruling out that it had come from a lab, until its ruled out its always still an option. As I mentioned above though there are positive samples from Spain that pre date Sept 19.
Those dates also coincide with the US Pandemic alert team leaving the Wuhan lab after Trump killed the funding.
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.
I have heard that from a number of people.
I’d heard people in Wuhan had covid like symptoms around Sept 2019 but hadn’t heard about Barcelona pre Sept…will look into it.
It's obvious - isn't it?How?
All you are doing is what we see happening in Australasia now. As soon as you open up you are back to square one. There should be a full cost benefit analysis done in respect of lockdown and the evidence should be in by now. What you continually see, almost everwhere you look, is that the shape of the 'wave' is almost identical, whatever measures have been implimented or not. Vaccines preventing severe illness and death are the only way out of this not lockdown or other NPI's that merely move the wave further along but also increase other Public Health issues.What kind of an answer is that? Social distancing has repeatedly been shown to reduce transmission. Of course it is not a long term answer but we don't have any alternative. Hospital numbers are up 500 in a week in advance of schools and colleges opening.
What we need are new vaccines or a 3rd dose. The WHO may well have a point that from a global perspective they should go to other nations but I can't see that happening.
Why?
We infected a significant slice of the population before vaccines and 150,000 died as a result.
Worst case for Aus/NZ is that the same slice of the population is infected, but after vaccination, so far less will die.
How is this a deep hole?
Excess deaths are the key to this now not deaths within 28 days.Aside from the conspiratorial nature of the claim (who issued this "instruction", when and why?), that just doesn't add up:
Deaths within 28 days of a test are consistent with certificates
Excess deaths are consistent with certificates
Fatality rate estimates from the UK aren't out of line with other comparative countries.
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.
I have heard that from a number of people.
Genuine question - what level of death and hospitalisation, say in comparison to the January peak do you think would justify this?
Half as much, the same, twice, more?
Not an attempted gotcha, just trying to understand.
Bloody too right. I thought the labs would be like fort knox and spotlessly clean, but apparently the hygiene levels in some are similar to your dentists, and these fuckers are messing about with shit like ebola!!!Gain of function research. Yep definitely scary stuff. It’s the potential (not definite) cause of all of this. If so, a serious discussion on the pros/cons of this type of research has to had.
It was more than 1200 on the highest days in the UK. That is about the England number though.If it gets to over half as much then the vaccines haven’t done their job and we are all fucked. What was the peak in Jan for deaths, 1,200? If it got anywhere near half that number of vaccinated people dying a day because of covid and not with it, then I would be worried.
What about you, when would you look at closing schools etc again?
To make things seemingly appear worse than what they actually are my friend.Why? What would be the point?
I don't think it would have been developed for weaponry or they it was released on purpose l, but after watching that programme I'm not too sure now if if didn't escape from a lab. There are characteristics of it that have never been seen in other viruses in nature.In all honesty I think if this was some sort of "weaponised" virus then its failed, in the grand scheme of things its not a large killer. Its not as bad as Spanish flu was for example. its enough to cause disruption no doubt but this isn't bubonic plague 2.0 or something similar. If it was something made with intent then surely MERS would have been a better choice?
Also once in the "wild" there would be no way to know what the mutated strains would do.
If it gets to over half as much then the vaccines haven’t done their job and we are all fucked. What was the peak in Jan for deaths, 1,200? If it got anywhere near half that number of vaccinated people dying a day because of covid and not with it, then I would be worried.
What about you, when would you look at closing schools etc again?