Coronavirus (2021) thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can safely say everyone I know has given up on the lockdown/ social distancing , my mum isolated for a year but now she is having us over, her friends and other family. All my mates having gatherings , I don’t know anyone who’s sticking to outside only rule at the moment.
 
Can safely say everyone I know has given up on the lockdown/ social distancing , my mum isolated for a year but now she is having us over, her friends and other family. All my mates having gatherings , I don’t know anyone who’s sticking to outside only rule at the moment.
I think it was inevitable once they relaxed the rules. People feel a bit safer after jab and not seen family for a while. It’s not warm enough to sit outside all day yet either. Probably see a slight spike in cases shortly.
 
Agree, and still plenty of people will tell you (wrongly) that lockdown had no impact at all on case numbers.
The stats would be even worse but for the voluntary lockdown that happened in the week before the Government’s first wave lockdown (people not using public transport, working from home, use of hand sanitizer etc). It’s an indictment of the Government’s mistakes in the early days that the population knew what to do before they did.
 
Can safely say everyone I know has given up on the lockdown/ social distancing , my mum isolated for a year but now she is having us over, her friends and other family. All my mates having gatherings , I don’t know anyone who’s sticking to outside only rule at the moment.

I think a lot of it comes down to how people define 'safe'. Officials tell us they won't do XYZ until it is safe and then proceed to depress everyone with more warnings about lockdowns, waves etc. However, more and more people are finding themselves not feeling 'unsafe' and adjusting their own risk assessed behaviour as a result. People can get angsty about it but that's the real world and I'm sure the behaviour scientists will have known this for ages.

it's seeming more and more like the epidemiologists' definition of 'safe' is almost zero risk which of course is never going to happen and so I'm becoming more convinced than ever that the end of this pamdemic (in the UK at least) will be a societal one because the medics simply seem to always want to push the line further away rather than getting over it. Whitty is right that Covid will almost certainly become a disease we live with and I suspect the people will decide when they've had enough and how 'unsafe' they feel no matter how many graphs Ferguson etc wheel out.
 
Last edited:
Can safely say everyone I know has given up on the lockdown/ social distancing , my mum isolated for a year but now she is having us over, her friends and other family. All my mates having gatherings , I don’t know anyone who’s sticking to outside only rule at the moment.
I can't get my Mum and Dad (mid-80s) to even leave the house and they had their second Pfizer dose on 3 January. I stood in the garden and talked to them last week and it was clear the last year has terrified them, and their many friends, into staying at home "until it's over". Their little patch of the Fens has hardly had a case, let alone a death, for weeks and they don't know anyone who has had Covid.
 
Nature.com lol. Is that a top shelfer??
if it was a top shelfer you might have read it
The nexus between Sage and ministers is key. Minutes have already shown that, by 10 March, Sage warned community transmission was under way, 500,000 people could die and care homes needed “special consideration”. The Guardian March 2021 analysis

Still 500,000 was being touted by Sage and it was being reported . If it passed you by what more can i say
 
if it was a top shelfer you might have read it
The nexus between Sage and ministers is key. Minutes have already shown that, by 10 March, Sage warned community transmission was under way, 500,000 people could die and care homes needed “special consideration”. The Guardian March 2021 analysis

Still 500,000 was being touted by Sage and it was being reported . If it passed you by what more can i say

500,000 uncontrolled.

250,000 if mitigated (peak reduced but not suppressed to R<1) were the predictions with the information at the time.

With what we know now, both were likely underestimates.
 
I can't get my Mum and Dad (mid-80s) to even leave the house and they had their second Pfizer dose on 3 January. I stood in the garden and talked to them last week and it was clear the last year has terrified them, and their many friends, into staying at home "until it's over". Their little patch of the Fens has hardly had a case, let alone a death, for weeks and they don't know anyone who has had Covid.

that’s sad , think a lot of people are so consumed in News that it weighs heavy on them
 
if it was a top shelfer you might have read it
The nexus between Sage and ministers is key. Minutes have already shown that, by 10 March, Sage warned community transmission was under way, 500,000 people could die and care homes needed “special consideration”. The Guardian March 2021 analysis

Still 500,000 was being touted by Sage and it was being reported . If it passed you by what more can i say
He's shining you on.

I would love there to be a wank mag called Nature tho. PHD's in glasses and white coats, teaching us about secondary sexual characteristics.

'We secretly fantasise about me getting Cited by all comers', says Dr X, 42, senior research assistant at John Hopkins - whose body of work was submitted to "Nature's Wives" by hubby Dr Y.V.P, who says he mostly wants to see some healthy reproduction.

'I want you to scatter your data all over my regression curves. You can mine my stuff whenever you want! We can even do it online, if you have a big enough pipe!'
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.