Coronavirus (2021) thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The booster gets us through this wave then we get another vaccine, and that one should be tailor-made for delta, omicron etc. And then we're in the same position as we are with flu. A nasty viral illness that we keep at bay with regular vaccination.

Isn't the difference with flu that these covid mutations are unpredictable though? In that Omicron seemed to take everyone by surprise. Then need to wait 90 days for vaccine to be tweaked and then a few more months for rollout etc? Or is there likely to become a much more timely, streamlined process for something like this to take place causing much more minimal disruption?
 
Not if you live in Greater Manchester - it is going like London last week and some astounding numbers today. Pretty much every borough is through the roof.

The lowest Pop score today was up 127. Some are nearer 300. Never seen numbers like these before.

Wigan today would have been a pandemic high for Manchester just last week.

I know these are only cases and milder etc. But these are bound to create pressure on the NHS this next week or two. They are just goimg up and up and doubling exactly as they say every two or three days in Greater Manchester right now.

I suspect GM may even be the epicentre now not London.

The MSOA where I live is now 1354/100k.

It's been high in the borough as a whole for a few weeks. Nearly 5,000 positives in the last week. However, deaths and hospitalisations have not budged for a month.
 
Sky reporting that the booster wanes against Omicron after ten weeks.
Think they said 20-30% reduction.
Which raises the question what is the reduction after a longer period say 16 weeks ( about four months) and should we start planning fourth boosters from February?
From what I can see the reduced severity of Omicron could be offset by the greater number of cases and the reduced effectiveness of the booster compared to delta and the fact that it wanes against Omicron ( but not Delta) relatively quickly.
I suppose it all depends on how these competing factors play out against one another.
 
Last edited:
On the off chance that people are interested in the modelling, as opposed to looking for reasons to promote their desired narrative, a thoughtful piece from the Institute for Government.

'It’s important, for instance, that modellers publish post-mortems that explain why numbers turned out differently'


Not seen them do this once as yet, and they have had plenty of opportunity have they not.
 
Isn't the difference with flu that these covid mutations are unpredictable though? In that Omicron seemed to take everyone by surprise. Then need to wait 90 days for vaccine to be tweaked and then a few more months for rollout etc? Or is there likely to become a much more timely, streamlined process for something like this to take place causing much more minimal disruption?
I don't think the process should be any different than with flu. We find what the prevailing Sars-Cov-2 mutations are at any one time and then produce a cocktail of vaccine. I think my last flu vaccine protected against 4 known strains of flu. I think flu is more mutagenic than Sars-Cov-2 but we have a bigger problem than anticipated with Sars-Cov-2 because when it is in immune-compromised hosts it can develop a whole host of mutations, some of which are viable. Thus it moves in leaps and bounds. WHether flu develops like that I don't know. We should also seek to widen our target away from the spike protein and include other targets.
 
Now there’s a surprise….

Just 132 admitted to hospital with the variant, ridiculously low number in comparison to how many cases we assume there’s been.

Yes I know the increased transmission but obviously nothing there to warrant more restrictions.
 
I don't think the process should be any different than with flu. We find what the prevailing Sars-Cov-2 mutations are at any one time and then produce a cocktail of vaccine. I think my last flu vaccine protected against 4 known strains of flu. I think flu is more mutagenic than Sars-Cov-2 but we have a bigger problem than anticipated with Sars-Cov-2 because when it is in immune-compromised hosts it can develop a whole host of mutations, some of which are viable. Thus it moves in leaps and bounds. WHether flu develops like that I don't know. We should also seek to widen our target away from the spike protein and include other targets.

Thank you, didn't know how these things worked.
 
Sky reporting that the booster wanes against Omicron after ten weeks.
Think they said 20-30% reduction.
Which raises the question what is the reduction after a longer period say 16 weeks ( about four months) and should we start planning fourth boosters from February?
From what I can see the reduced severity of Omicron could be offset by the greater number of cases and the reduced effectiveness of the booster compared to delta and the fact that it wanes against Omicron ( but not Delta) relatively quickly.
I suppose it all depends on how these competing factors play out against one another.
But that waning is against symptomatic infection, protection against serious disease lasts much longer
 
But that waning is against symptomatic infection, protection against serious disease lasts much longer

This is my understanding. If we want a vaccine which prevents every really mild infection forever more then its simply just never going to happen. Their job is to prevent serious illness or death, so long as that is maintained for a more prolonged period of time (annually?) then it's all good. Headlines about waning boosters are needless and only serve to encourage fear where it isn't really necessary, and probably discourage some people from actually getting boosters which is extremely counter productive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.