There's hardly any reports of reinfection worldwide.
Is that taking into account this new 'super' strain though?
There's hardly any reports of reinfection worldwide.
In London yep, everywhere else fully open!Is that advice not pretty much what primary schools in tier four,are doing anyway? (key workers kids, no full classes etc)
Experience
We do make the Oxford vaccine in the UK in 4 plants. More than enough to cover UK requirements. 4m doses a week.1. We don’t make the vaccine here in any useful numbers.
2. It is well documented by medical staff that we only have enough people to administer the vaccine at the current rate.
A different crew wouldn't make the slightest difference
That is terrible, poor thing , such a nice girl , glad she has recovered , seems wembley was a hotspot1000 people on our sites so bound to know a few. 8 at the ex’s Christmas dinner. Just found out my cousin has it and is very very bad with it and he is only mid 40s and of course Karen who was one of the first and got it at Wembley. I found out only today that one of the daughters mates I took down to Wembley in March was so ill the week after she had to go in an ambulance that week. She must have had it. Must tell Karen.
Tbh if we are all going to chuck kids into the vast human petri-dish that,is school everyday we might as well all carry on as normal. Maybe the Govt has negotiated a truce whereby covid has agreed not to infect school kids in the same way it only infects pub goers after 10 pm?In London yep, everywhere else fully open!
There are very few reports of reinfections.I thought Heard immunity was a myth in this case, since people have had it multiple times, that's a plan that would always be set to fail, id also like to see the correlation between people who had the first strain, compared to the new one ? id imagine that will be the devil in the detail
Might be a bit of work for me there...I drove through Marple Bridge the other day and saw a queue of people going into a pub.
No idea what was happening and whether they were going out to the beer garden but we were in tier 4 at that time.
It’s utter madness.
Going to get very bitter
NEU just updated: Summing up: following the SAGE meeting 22/12, and other recently published scientific papers, all of which have been ignored by the Government, we believe that it would be unsafe for Primary staff to attend work on Monday 4 Jan for whole classes. Current RAs do not take into account the new COVID variant.We are recommending that members quote section 44 of the 1996 Employment Rights Act and tell their HTs that they won’t be attending the workplace on Monday to work with whole classes. They will be available to work at home, or attend the workplace on a rota for Key Worker or vulnerable pupils. The same applies in special schools, albeit there will be more pupils who are vulnerable. An email will be sent to all members with a section 44 template letter to use. Please communicate this to all members - some won’t open emails from the union on the last weekend of the holidays!
Super strain? There's been many mutations since it's beginning, none of which seems to have any adverse affects regards to reinfection.Is that taking into account this new 'super' strain though?
Counsel.Teaching unions have instructed legal council to explore likelihood of successful action if they sue the government. How has it come to this? And no, this isn’t anything anyone can heap on the teachers or unions. 100% government fuck up.
A message sent out to all NAHT members. NAHT and ASCL are suing the Government- extraordinary (and welcome)!
An important update regarding the start of term
Since my last email to you on Wednesday, the team at NAHT has been working intensively to explore all the options that could be available to us collectively, and to you as individuals.
Today I wanted to provide you with an update on that work.
Throughout the deliberations we have had to consider carefully which actions are most likely to have the desired impact, and which are feasible given the time constraints we face together with a desire to maintain the confidence of the communities you support.
We have also had to ensure that our members would be fully protected with regard to the action we take on their behalf, or that they themselves might take according to their circumstances.
NAHT’s policy position is clear: We want to see children in school. It is the best place for their education and their wider well-being. We understand that the government has been seeking to strike a balance between minimising the risk of transfer of COVID-19 and providing face-to-face education for all children.
However, the latest data shows that in large parts of the country, control of infection has been lost and the lack of understanding regarding the new strain has now created intolerable risk to many school communities.
We are calling upon government to remove people in schools from the physical harm caused by the current progress of the disease and to work with the profession and Public Health England to establish new protocols and interventions to make schools covid-secure. More about this below.
Our response - legal action
On Wednesday, I instructed Queen’s Council to examine the government’s announcement and outline the legal options available to us.
As a result, on Thursday afternoon, we commenced preliminary steps in legal proceedings against the Department for Education.
This represents a significant step for us to have taken as a union, and it is not a decision we have taken lightly.
Our colleagues at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) accepted an invitation to join us in this action.
The legal process we have instigated covers a wide range of issues from the scientific advice the government is drawing on, right through to the proposed arrangements for covid testing in schools.
We are now awaiting the government’s response. That will determine our next steps.
Once we have seen the response, we will need to rely on our appointed Queen’s Counsel and the NAHT and ASCL legal teams to determine the likelihood of success should we continue with the legal action. If at that point we need to take a different approach, we will be prepared to do so.
Alongside this we have also been putting pressure on the government to revisit its list of ‘high risk’ areas. Many of you have been in touch to point out some of the starker anomalies and inconsistencies in the list of high-risk areas and, along with others, we have been pursuing all of these. Yesterday evening we saw the government announce that all London Boroughs would now be told to follow the contingency framework. We will continue to press this issue for other parts of the country.
Section 44 - Social media speculation
We are aware that there is conversation on social media regarding the use of Section 44 of the Health and Safety at Work Act for employees to refuse to work if they consider the workplace to be unsafe.
We expect members will have several questions about this including what NAHT’s own position is on the matter, and what leaders need to do if they are informed by staff that they will not attend school. To support you with this, we will issue guidance today – you should receive a further email from us on this in due course.
Next steps and the immediate situation
I am acutely aware that we are only a matter of days away from the start of the term and, as such, many of you will have already been reviewing your risk assessments and speaking with governors, staff and parents.
We now find ourselves in a position where some of those risk assessments could suggest that it will not be safe to open the school next week. As an example, an absence of staff could well mean that schools do not have capacity to open safely for all pupils.
If, as a result of your risk assessment, you find yourself in such a position, we recommend you inform the LA or Trust immediately. Our advice team are also continuing to work with individual members and you can contact them on 0300 30 30 333.
We will be continuing to argue throughout the weekend that government needs to change its approach if we have any chance of success at keeping schools open to all pupils and not just for the most vulnerable and those of key workers.
The government’s current approach is too simplistic and is damaging education. It is time to properly respond to what professional educators need rather than how attractive a headline may read.
The government is alienating the profession, failing children and being reckless with the safety of the whole school community.
We believe that the government should take the following steps:
Move all schools to home learning for a brief and determined period for most children.
During this time, proper support to make the home learning experience as good as it can be should be provided. That includes technology and learning resources but also the flexibility for school leaders to respond to their circumstances. A centralised, prescriptive approach is too constrained.
The government should then establish a properly organised, resourced and funded mass testing regime for schools in place of the botched DIY system currently being imposed.
Work should be undertaken with school leaders and PHE to establish and agree new covid-related safety measures in schools during the temporary restriction.
Urgently review its approach to special schools, APs and Maintained Nursery Schools to protect all staff and pupils in those communities.
Immediately prioritise vaccinations in education
Then agree an orderly return
I think we can all see that, in the short term at least, a difficult and rocky road lies ahead. No other generation of school leaders has had to face the sorts of challenges you are currently dealing with. My commitment to you is that we will continue to work tirelessly to support you and to stand by you in days, weeks and months ahead. We will, of course, continue to keep you updated as to the latest developments and we have done throughout the last year.
Best wishes
Paul Whiteman
NAHT general secretary
info@naht.org.uk
The point is not whether you get it worse the second time , it is that immunity is not working , there are plenty in the us frontline who have had it twiceVery, very few have had it multiple times and only a couple have had it worse the second time round.
I know right, he couldn't have been more wrong. Plenty on here quick to agree with him but disregard all the experts. I pretty much gave up commenting on this thread after that.Where is the so called data expert who insisted that the figures were wrong weeks ago and there was not nor going to be a second wave even , he is with the oncologist and phil now i guess
Yeah, the rimming of him was a low pointI know right, he couldn't have been more wrong. Plenty on here quick to agree with him but disregard all the experts. I pretty much gave up commenting on this thread after that.
Have you got a link you can post ? The only one could find was thisThe point is not whether you get it worse the second time , it is that immunity is not working , there are plenty in the us frontline who have had it twice
I get it from cnn , they have several who were in hospital first time but tested positive later on after going back to work , research will catch upHave you got a link you can post ? The only one could find was this
This is a new thread.I know right, he couldn't have been more wrong. Plenty on here quick to agree with him but disregard all the experts. I pretty much gave up commenting on this thread after that.