Healdplace
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2013
- Messages
- 15,985
Seems some recalculation of past deaths is the reason for the number today being lower than we had from the four nations.
Hopefully returning by Easter, is tipping us the nod, or he would of said hopefully before that, Easter latest, couldn’t be clearer. Find another post to pester.You said he was giving us the nod that returning after mid term was not happening.
I have a question to anyone who has had a home test on an in person test (the full ones that take a day or 2 for a result) - did your negative result say this
"Your coronavirus test result is negative. It’s likely you did not have the virus when the test was done."
I've put "likely" in bold, as it is different than the test result i had in December (and August) which said
"Your coronavirus test result is negative. You did not have the virus when the test was done"
So i'm just trying to check have they official changed their wording this year to "likely" rather than a definite "you did not", to maybe cover themselves...? Or, was there something in my test that could have made them not totally sure?
I was quite unwell for a week with a fever, sore throat, diarreah at the start too (monday, did the test wednesday), and complete exhaustion and dizzyness. Feeling mostly better now, but trying to judge.. I doubt it was that, as i feel i'd be more ill if it was, but it was a scary feeling, looking at my 4 year old worried i could die, i felt that ill on one of the days in particular. I had the flu jab in October btw.
Anyone with January tests out there? Thank you.
Same here.Yes, I read that too...hence my curiosity in this whole area.
I know I'm Negative, think it's O but might be A. I had to have the usual injection to counter this when I gave birth to my son.
Need to ask my GP at some point.
Last 4 Sundays:-These cases aren’t coming down quick enough at all
You are right , my sept one said did not , my dec one said likely not , maybe a truer statement given the false positive and negatives that occurI have a question to anyone who has had a home test on an in person test (the full ones that take a day or 2 for a result) - did your negative result say this
"Your coronavirus test result is negative. It’s likely you did not have the virus when the test was done."
I've put "likely" in bold, as it is different than the test result i had in December (and August) which said
"Your coronavirus test result is negative. You did not have the virus when the test was done"
So i'm just trying to check have they official changed their wording this year to "likely" rather than a definite "you did not", to maybe cover themselves...? Or, was there something in my test that could have made them not totally sure?
I was quite unwell for a week with a fever, sore throat, diarreah at the start too (monday, did the test wednesday), and complete exhaustion and dizzyness. Feeling mostly better now, but trying to judge.. I doubt it was that, as i feel i'd be more ill if it was, but it was a scary feeling, looking at my 4 year old worried i could die, i felt that ill on one of the days in particular. I had the flu jab in October btw.
Anyone with January tests out there? Thank you.
Isn't it just :-(Same here.
I seem to remember in the dim and distant past being disappointed that it was the common one, but then again I may have dreamt it as I really haven’t a clue.
I should ask my GP as well, although getting through to them is like breaking into Fort Knox.
These cases aren’t coming down quick enough at all
Thank you for replying, at least i now know it's not just me and it's their new wording for all :)You are right , my sept one said did not , my dec one said likely not , maybe a truer statement given the false positive and negatives that occur