bernabias home shirt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 14,916
Thats all i need to know!SWP's back said:Yes you could
.
Thats all i need to know!SWP's back said:Yes you could
.
About to go into a meeting, so I'm my car on my phone but I can answer each of your points very satisfactorily and will do in a couple of hours.<br /><br />-- Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:43 pm --<br /><br />daveduke67 said:SWP's back said:Yes you could, if you are happy to rent and live off £50k per year tax free (Equivalent to earning arounf £80-90k).
You would just invest it into a Income Distribution Bond (simple Capital Investment Bond with option to take yearly, bi-annual, quaterly or monthly distributions), you are allowed to take 5% per year (monthly if you wish) tax "free" as it is deemed a return of capital. Historical returns see 7-9% pa, so your capital is not eroded, over the long term and the money would easily outlast you so long as you stick to 5% pa.
-- Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:42 am --
But they don't though. Most look after it very wisely after taking advice. Only twats spend it all and have none left.didactic said:No bro the only reason you are able to "live" on what you earn is because you never got it all in one lump sum.
£1000000 is easy to spend you would buy family gifts, spend on things you would never have bought before. Its not suprising that lottery winners spend it all because they get it all in one go
Now if its a million over 30 years at 30 odd thousand a year then sure I can live on it but not retire on it and id be in my late 50s when it finished so id keep working.
-- Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:43 am --
You're figures are wrong "bro".didactic said:For it to last you and your family would have to live on about £25 000 a year for the next 40 years.
-- Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:44 am --
What? Absolute and utter bollocks. Complete horse shit mate.denislawsbackheel said:Not a dream
a delusion
Invested a million would bring in £30K before tax as already said.
Take the £30K as income and your million is deteriorating in value at (currently) over 5% a year.
Re the income bond. Assuming that the bond did manage a return of 7%, you take 5% of that leaving a growth of 2% on the initial capital invested.
What would that make the bond worth in, say, twenty years? Would 5% of that value buy you the same as it would today. Would your initial investment in 2031 be able to buy you what a million would today? This is assuming that returns have exceeded withdrawals - historically has this always happened?
What has the average investment bond returned the last five years? Would you advise that someone invest 100% of their capital in one type of risk based investment - nothing in no risk savings accounts?
Surely it'd be better to spread the capital into various risk categories and investment types rather than all the eggs in one basket?
About to go into a meeting, so I'm my car on my phone but I can answer each of your points very satisfactorily and will do in a couple of hours.daveduke67 said:SWP's back said:Yes you could, if you are happy to rent and live off £50k per year tax free (Equivalent to earning arounf £80-90k).
You would just invest it into a Income Distribution Bond (simple Capital Investment Bond with option to take yearly, bi-annual, quaterly or monthly distributions), you are allowed to take 5% per year (monthly if you wish) tax "free" as it is deemed a return of capital. Historical returns see 7-9% pa, so your capital is not eroded, over the long term and the money would easily outlast you so long as you stick to 5% pa.
-- Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:42 am --
But they don't though. Most look after it very wisely after taking advice. Only twats spend it all and have none left.didactic said:No bro the only reason you are able to "live" on what you earn is because you never got it all in one lump sum.
£1000000 is easy to spend you would buy family gifts, spend on things you would never have bought before. Its not suprising that lottery winners spend it all because they get it all in one go
Now if its a million over 30 years at 30 odd thousand a year then sure I can live on it but not retire on it and id be in my late 50s when it finished so id keep working.
-- Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:43 am --
You're figures are wrong "bro".didactic said:For it to last you and your family would have to live on about £25 000 a year for the next 40 years.
-- Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:44 am --
What? Absolute and utter bollocks. Complete horse shit mate.denislawsbackheel said:Not a dream
a delusion
Invested a million would bring in £30K before tax as already said.
Take the £30K as income and your million is deteriorating in value at (currently) over 5% a year.
Re the income bond. Assuming that the bond did manage a return of 7%, you take 5% of that leaving a growth of 2% on the initial capital invested.
What would that make the bond worth in, say, twenty years? Would 5% of that value buy you the same as it would today. Would your initial investment in 2031 be able to buy you what a million would today? This is assuming that returns have exceeded withdrawals - historically has this always happened?
What has the average investment bond returned the last five years? Would you advise that someone invest 100% of their capital in one type of risk based investment - nothing in no risk savings accounts?
Surely it'd be better to spread the capital into various risk categories and investment types rather than all the eggs in one basket?
Tuearts right boot said:stimo said:i reckon i could, but apparently to be classed as a millionaire (without having to work again) you've gotta have £4million now because of the current financial climateJa Salford Blue said:moving on from the $165m lotto win thread, could you retire off £1m?
I think i quite eaisily could and i'm only in my 20's
what about anyone else?
There was a survey done by Camelot about 5 years ago.They reckoned £8m was the threshold for a millionaire lifestyle and the means to maintain said lifestyle.
Roughly broken down.....
2m on houses
1/2 m on cars
1m on financial and charitable gifts
1/2m Holidays and presents etc etc
4m with interest to maintain the above
Godfather said:Easily! I'm 27, have no mortgage and we live off £18.5k a year now, saving about £4k a year! Im a minimalist you see and HATe frittering money away on absolute shite, every purchase is really thought about. £1m may as well be a billion to me!
daveduke67 said:Re the income bond. Assuming that the bond did manage a return of 7%, you take 5% of that leaving a growth of 2% on the initial capital invested.
What would that make the bond worth in, say, twenty years? Would 5% of that value buy you the same as it would today. Would your initial investment in 2031 be able to buy you what a million would today? This is assuming that returns have exceeded withdrawals - historically has this always happened?
The "average" bond has returned just over 6% pa over the last 20 years. THSP managed fund has averaged 9.7% over the last 20 years (a period more tumultuous than any other in history, including black wednesday, dot com bubble burst, 9/11, Iraq/Afghanistan and the credit crunch), so it would be fair to say that similar returns (if not possibly greater) could be forecast going forward.daveduke67 said:What has the average investment bond returned the last five years?
daveduke67 said:Would you advise that someone invest 100% of their capital in one type of risk based investment - nothing in no risk savings accounts?
A capital investment bond of £1M could, in theory be invested into 200 different funds, and cover a veritable smörgåsbord of risk and investment strategies. Just because it is all ring fenced under the same policy number does not affect that. You could have funds that invest in cash, derivatives, bonds, gilts, equities, property etc (ie all the asset classes) and one would obviously pick the funds to match the investors unique risk profile, goals and aspirations.daveduke67 said:Surely it'd be better to spread the capital into various risk categories and investment types rather than all the eggs in one basket?