super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 48,675
Absolutely Crazy. And they blame us for inflating the market. That is 3 x his worth.
Any idea how much the dippers get upfront? Bearing in mind they have just splashed £75m on VVD!
Good business for Liverpool, they refused £113m in the summer, and now they got £140m.
the insane thing is that 140 doesnt sound that much more than 113. but its f*cking 27 million more! This market has truly gone mad and I kind of like it. No player in our squad costs even half a Coutinho, and we are supposed to be the big spendersGood business for Liverpool, they refused £113m in the summer, and now they got £140m.
Tbf we did spunk a load on shite originally like Kolo, Bridge, RSC, Adabayor, Robinho etc. Some of our original spending (very early on) was poor and excessive in the market at that time.So despite the fact that everyone names City as the club who have ruined Football, bought the title and splashed on expensive players, we don’t possess any of the top 15 most expensive transfers in history! Go figure that
the insane thing is that 140 doesnt sound that much more than 113. but its f*cking 27 million more! This market has truly gone mad and I kind of like it. No player in our squad costs even half a Coutinho, and we are supposed to be the big spenders