That last bit of your post is rubbish,those two have just said it is ok to do the opposite of what they have had us doing for three months,as they are saying what he did was right we need it clarified as to what us plebs can do,we have been told to be really strict and by and large the public have stuck to it at great personal costThey could have asked that once and then gone on to other issues. Many questions were asking the transport guy about things such as whether the police spoke to Cummings, whether Johnson knew and when he knew etc. Mainly all things he wouldn't have the answer to. They can spend all day slagging off Cummings on the news and in the papers if they wish.
I understand that point scoring against the government is of more interest to you but I (and am sure millions of others) would prefer to actually get some info about the virus during these briefings.
In the briefings they say 0.25%5% was the rough estimates I've seen and we are are still guessing at that.Positive tests are at about 0.4%
Well it can't be with 257,000 positive tests.In the briefings they say 0.25%
He took the child in case him and his wife became ill,they could have stayed home in isolation having their food delivered in london,a family member who wasn't ill or isolating could have collected the child if they both became too ill,the child is the excuse to go where he went‘he has friends in London who could have looked after his child’ you know this as a fact? Not sure if you have children but parents would not just hand their kids over to friends. I know I wouldn’t for a number of reasons.
we need it clarified as to what us plebs can do,we have been told to be really strict and by and large the public have stuck to it at great personal cist
He took the child in case him and his wife became ill,they could have stayed home in isolation having their food delivered in london,a family member who wasn't ill or isolating could have collected the child if they both became too ill,the child is the excuse to go where he went
We are drifting into politics,for the other thread I thinkYou really believe that was the motivation behind the questions?
If we have stuck to it, then we already know what we can and should do, regardless of what one other individual does.
How do you they couldnt ?Again, how do you know a family member could have collected the child?
We are drifting into politics,for the other thread I think
And if we all do it we will be back in lockdownFound the briefing rather informative myself. I can travel to relatives if I require support.
And if you have a camera you don't have to socially distance. I don't like the look of Cummings, he appears to be an arrogant **** but I would think all the ones outraged are either Labour MPs or the twats who flooded to the beaches this weekFound the briefing rather informative myself. I can travel to relatives if I require support.
Only travel during lockdown if there is an 'extreme risk to life'
Dr Jenny Harries refused to comment when asked if Dominic Cummings's actions undermine the "stay at home" message.
She told the press conference: "In relation to the advice to the public, it's absolutely clear that public health guidance is, if you're symptomatic you stay at home, take yourself out of society as quickly as you can with your family and stay there, unless there is extreme risk to life.
"That is a really important message, people have been really good at doing that, but it's vital that we continue to do that going forward.
Daily briefing
Clarifying guidance about travel during lockdown, Dr Jenny Harries said it was "clear" someone with symptoms should self-isolate along with their family.
Dr Harries added that "built in" to all guidance to protect the vulnerable "there is always an element which says safeguarding".
She said: "So we don't want an elderly person sitting at home without their medication because they feel they can't come out."
Dr Harries said if there was a "safeguarding issue" where a child had "no support", that was also an issue.
"There's always a safeguarding clause in all of the advice," she said, adding: "The interpretation of that advice is probably for others.
Got to do as she is told if she wants to keep her top job.The CMO is complicit in blowing the stay at home message wide open,disappointed in her
I have come to expect it from trumps medics,when they said something wrong they were hauled back to "clarify" then he muzzled them,i don't want that to happen hereGot to do as she is told if she wants to keep her top job.
A spokesman for The Singapore University of Technology said: "The model and data are inaccurate to the complex, evolving, and heterogeneous realities of different Predictions are uncertain by nature. Readers must take any predictions with caution.
"Over-optimism based on some predicted end dates is dangerous because it may loosen our disciplines and controls and cause the turnaround of the virus and infection, and must be avoided.
Read your own links for god's sake,everything you say is misleading