Because your are socially distancing yourself from others. If you were anti socially distancing, it becomes a double negative and means you are invading peoples’ personal space.
As for the rest of your post, look at the death numbers. Socially distancing is working dramatically in limiting the death rate.
if you are disputing how many deaths are related to the virus, just looking at the spike in excess deaths suggests that the virus is having a profound effect on our death toll, however sceptical you are at how the deaths are recorded.
I get where you are coming from, and if it were up to me, I’d simply say do it if you have the nous to socially distance.
if it were up to me, then I wouldn’t be entertaining relaxing the lockdown if I were in government as the daily death rate is too high.
I am not looking for an argument with you either. But I go with my head not my heart. My head tells me meeting with family from 30 feet away is safe. You are just going with the herd and seem to need others to back up your argument. Why don't you just tell me why that is not safe when none of us have been in contact with anyone else for 30 days ?
Why did the Tanzian government send tests of a goat that came back positive? Because they are labelling everything as Covid19. Press have been using images of coffins from a distaster in 2013 and saying they were Covid19 deaths. The media lie don't believe a ducking word pal. I'll post evidence when on laptop.
Alan relaxing the lockdown IS saying to the likes of us "do it but socially distance "
The thickos that will ignore it are the same thickos that are ignoring it now so whats to lose ??
Just do it if you have the ability to minimise risk. Ignore the government.
The government’s response has to factor in the cretins.
I get that. We all lead with our heart, I’m no different.
In terms of being 30 feet away, that’s fine. It’s no different to standing in a supermarket cue.
My argument is that many people will not do what you will do or what I would do in that situation. It would become a free for all once measures like this get lifted.
There is also no guarantee that any family is safe no matter what we may believe. To keep this thing away we are literally washing hands after everything we touch that has come from outside. Everything. Many are also asymptomatic.
It just presents too many problems mate and however safe me, you or others do it, there are way too many that won’t.
It’s always the minority that fucking ruin it for the majority.
Having read back your last few posts I think you do understand transmission so my apologies for suggesting otherwise, I just don’t see at this moment we blanket say, go and see your families with the stipulate of social distancing.
People will just rip the piss out of it.
How long before such lifting results in party’s in the back garden with 20 odd family members? It’ll happen.
The best way the government can factor in the cretins is to keep the lockdown in place until it’s absolutely safe to lift it.
The vast majority stuck to the rules,it has worked,don't use those as an excuse to do it too,just wait,nobody likes this but this is not a normal timeMate the idiots are ripping it NOW. Its already a free for all. Except its the sensible people who are trying to keep the rules who are banned from seeing their loved ones from umpteen meters away whilst scallies on their bikes are riding shoulder to shoulder along tracks already filled with joggers. There's no sense to it. So for one, Im not prepared to keep saying "Oh OK i'll stay away from my family even 30 feet away" (with no risk to anyone) whilst the numpties are all partying risking everyone they come into contact with.
How long before such lifting results in party’s in the back garden with 20 odd family members? It’ll happen.
The best way the government can factor in the cretins is to keep the lockdown in place until it’s absolutely safe to lift it.