Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 29,274
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
That's what the scientific advisor said.Surely London is the highest? That doesn't make sense.
That's what the scientific advisor said.Surely London is the highest? That doesn't make sense.
What many want to know was how can we be sure that these changes won't lift the R rate above 1?
Only people from schenghen countries and the UK are allowed into France currently.May have been addressed but what’s to drop anyone who wants to come here and avoid quanrantine travelling through France?
There is a lot of confusion in that article. Dissemindted Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) is not a pulmonary embolism (a big clot in an important place).Looked at this today, just a blog but hopefully an element of truth somewhere:
https://www.gistflash.com/discovery...lation-pulmonary-thrombosis/lifestyle/health/
Is that William Hague?
That is truly shocking and not something to discover on a Monday morning.
"Pretty" clear.
Sorry to be glib here mate, but nobody can be sure of anything.
Everything is an estimate or a guess. It's a novel virus. Nobody "knows" or is "sure" of anything.
We have to start trying to get back to some bit of normality soon, for many different reasons, doing so while keeping an eye on r0 and hospitalizations is the only current exit strategy. If they spike, we lockdown. We know lockdown works to reduce transmission.
I agree that people shouldn’t be forced back without a reasonable safety plan. In most cases that can be worked out locally to everyone’s satisfaction.Nobody. But there will be hundreds of employers who will interpret that message as one of getting their business going and who will not give a flying fuck about safety and who won't have done any Covid planning, won't provide PPE. It should be statutory: have a Covid Plan that meets government approval or you can't start. He's deliberately left it vague.
We don’t.Fwiw, I didn't report GD for the post and I didn't want him thread banned. Wasn't really arsed. I know GD lost his temper, but I do appreciate that I can be an annoying **** sometimes :)
On topic of this thread, which is based around some questions I had. I didn't actually want an explanation of how they calculate the R rate. Not sure most do as I imagined it'd be lost on many - me included. What many want to know was how can we be sure that these changes won't lift the R rate above 1? What's the reasoning behind it? Does the science suggest meeting more people now and going outside more regularly is still safe etc? It's a fair enough question. If its too complicated to answer, then fair enough. There must be a simple way of explaining it though.