ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,211
I'm not advocating painting an unnecessarily bleak picture either but I was listening to some mental health expert who had done a lot of work with the armed forces in Afghanistan. He was saying that you just have to be as honest as possible about things when there aren't certainties that you can give people. If you paint an overly bleak picture then clearly that is no good but he said they realised that if they gave soldiers an optimistic prediction of when they would be going home then it was noticeable how detrimental it was to mental health in the long run when those predictions didn't come to fruition. He noted that if you were just as honest as possible from the start, even if the predictions were not what people wanted to hear, they were able to prepare themselves for what was to come and tended to cope much better mentally overall. He was referencing this in the context of discussing covid and his view was that people need to know the most likely scenario where possible. Every time I have seen anything from that oncologist, it has been something that just seems unlikely and highly optimistic. I'm not sure that helps anyone tbh. But that's only my opinion.
My problem with him is that he doesn't appreciate the potential danger of his words. I follow him as I do think he says some useful things sometimes. Other times though he infuriates me. The other day he shared his thoughts that it may burn out. A theory that was basically just one possibility, literally just based on a hopeful guess tbh. Next day we've got articles in national newspapers saying 'leading professor says coronavirus could disappear'. This could then lead people to not take it seriously, dropping their guard and not 'staying alert', which could then result in the potential death of one our loved ones.
Yes, I know he didn't write those headlines, but he simply has to be more cautious. He's an intelligent man and should be aware of the potential effects of tweeting that out to 250k followers. You can literally see the effects on here - posters have cited their opinion that it could just go away, referencing him. Im not saying they have dropped their guard personally, but I guarantee someone would have. Its dangerous IMO, and it needs more consideration. I don't mind optimism, and I do appreciate it, but he needs to consider his approach a bit more at times.
Two good, well reasoned posts here guys. As I say, I'm not necessarily disagreeing with either of you or Karen here. I've said before that I prefer being told how it is, no matter how poor that picture is. Just feel we're getting told that A LOT over the past few months so in that time it's been a bit beneficial to hear someone scraping at the barrel for something a bit more positive.
Also, from what I've noticed, posts such as suggesting things might peter out are quite rare from him. His usual optimism seems to be in noticing infection rates drop, or death rates drop - and is quick to point it out. Or if there's a weekend lag and subsequently a big figure on a Tuesday then he'll point that out too. Then with other countries opening up certain aspects of normal life - I like hearing that stuff.
Hark at me bigging up a guy I'd never heard of 2 months ago, just think he and others like him might deserve to be cut a bit of slack.