Lots of wides don’t get given in test match cricket. And to decide a match on one is generally less likely, it’s not in the spirit of the game and especially not when the Kiwis are concerned*.It’s a wide or it’s not a wide, and that was a wide
Bat again instead of enforcing the follow-on and we win. Still can't get my head round putting them back in given it was the best time for batting.
But Stokes philosophy is attack, attack, attack, which is great entertainment but will also cost us.
The Aussies will love it and I'm fully prepared for a 100ao against them, especially given their bowling attack.
As an aside Stokes' injuries are becoming a problem. Can't really contribute on one leg and he's a better batsman when he's spending 'time' at the crease building an innings, which he did under Root.
This has also proven that 2 match Series are a joke. After those two matches, who doesn't want to see a decider right now.
I know the calendar is already rammed, but its unfair that sides like NZ and SA only ever play 2 or 3 match Series, while England, Australia and India play in these big 5 match series every year.
Didn't realise it made such a huge loss. I still think it should be up to boards with the most money to sort this out however. The BCCI can't be short of money with the IPL and all, the ICC should have rules in place meaning boards have to spend a certain amount of their revenue on Test Cricket.The calendar isn't the problem, it's that test matches lose money.
The average test match loses New Zealand Cricket US $500,000 and their total budget is about $35m