******Cricket Thread******

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is pretty good from New Zealand - 60 added and almost 90 minutes used by the time it restarts.
Field suggests that they have no idea how to get them out, and 300 in 72 overs is a good challenge.

Not impossible though as the pitch is good and some boundaries are short.
 
This is pretty good from New Zealand - 60 added and almost 90 minutes used by the time it restarts.
Field suggests that they have no idea how to get them out, and 300 in 72 overs is a good challenge.

Not impossible though as the pitch is good and some boundaries are short.
They can hide the ball should they wish though.
 
I could say the same for you.

You don’t get to define what others think.

Sorry, Mr Fun Sponge.

You‘re like Jeff Sterling without an iota of humour.

Except I'm not the only person who disagreed with your nonsense use of the word, and actually yes, words do have defined meanings.

Also presumably you mean Jeff Stelling, as Jeff Sterling doesn't exist AFAIK.
 
Except I'm not the only person who disagreed with your nonsense use of the word.

Also presumably you mean Jeff Stelling, as Jeff Sterling doesn't exist AFAIK.
Kind of proves my point. You have to go around correcting everything and are unable to have a joke or try to comprehend why autocorrect might revert to Sterling on a City board.

 
At 1-0 in the series, just see off the new ball and then assess the chances of winning is my strategy. 75-2 after 30 overs leaves 225 at around 5.5 an over. Can't see England bothering myself. Then again it's Stokes so he'll go for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.