Cricket Thread

[waspish]

I'm not so sure about that , I feel we may go with an extra seamer

Maybe it is at lords and spin don’t usually take many wickets!

Wood
Broad
Anderson
Robinson
Stokes
Maybe Woakes

 

[hello]

Got to love the umpires dedication to food in not having the inspection during lunch

 

[Gabriel]

Got to love the umpires dedication to food in not having the inspection during lunch

Those two do look like a couple who enjoy their nosh. Surprised Umpire Erasmus can see the popping crease when he looks down, certainly can't see his belt.

 

[trueblue1972]

Maybe it is at lords and spin don’t usually take many wickets!

Wood
Broad
Anderson
Robinson
Stokes
Maybe Woakes

Probably correct as an outsider Matt Potts could also be an option

 

[kippaxwarrior]

Main covers have been taken off....

 

[kippaxwarrior]

Play starts at 2.15

 

[domalino]

Unless the ball is going to be swinging round corners like on Sunday afternoon there's not enough time for a result.

 

[kippaxwarrior]

Unless the ball is going to be swinging round corners like on Sunday afternoon there's not enough time for a result.

Probably get around 40-45 overs in as play can go up to 7pm or 7.30 if a result is pending.

Depends how hard Australia go

 

[waspish]

Play starts at 2:15 a minimum of 67 overs tea taken at 4:30 so those 2 hours 15 minutes is where we need to take at least 3 wickets

 

[trueblue1972]

Unless the ball is going to be swinging round corners like on Sunday afternoon there's not enough time for a result.

A bit 4 an over roughly with no more delays I feel all 3 results are possible