Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,978
Yeah as there was no score that would make WI and England’s NRR both being better than SA’s.
If it was won by a run, the NRR would dip for the tournament.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cricket Thread
- Thread starter Gabriel
- Start date
If it was won by a run, the NRR would dip for the tournament.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Have the shit sky commentators actually mentioned what the qualification permutations are? I haven’t watched every ball but I’ve heard nothing. Surely their job is to be experts, and inform, and explain?
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Surely if West Indies win in the 20th over our NRR would only drop slightly and still be better than SA’s? What am I missing AHT?Yeah as there was no score that would make WI and England’s NRR both being better than SA’s.
If it was won by a run, the NRR would dip for the tournament.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,978
It’d be 0 for this game. 1.7 over 4 games is 6.8 in total. Divide that by 5 and you get 1.36.Surely if West Indies win in the 20th over our NRR would only drop slightly and still be better than SA’s? What am I missing AHT?
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Got you. Wasn’t aware that’s how they did it, is that how they do it in the men’s game? Thanks for explainingIt’d be 0 for this game. 1.7 over 4 games is 6.8 in total. Divide that by 5 and you get 1.36.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Is a tie one point each or a super over? In a group game?
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,978
I’m not 100% sure, it’s just something that could make sense.Got you. Wasn’t aware that’s how they did it, is that how they do it in the men’s game? Thanks for explaining
If it is that way, not sure why it took until the end of England’s innings to decipher that SA qualified.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Game over
nmc
Well-Known Member
England have been very ordinary today… piss poor in the field.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,978
Teams with a higher net run rate are those who score more runs than they concede and vice versa. NRR is used as a tiebreaker if teams are level on points.Got you. Wasn’t aware that’s how they did it, is that how they do it in the men’s game? Thanks for explaining
If a team is all out before it completes its overs, the 'against' run rate is calculated using the full 20 overs.
Using England's first two completed matches from the last T20 World Cup as an example:
Runs for
- England 113/5 – 18 overs and 1 ball (v Afghanistan)
- England 179/6 – 20 overs (v New Zealand)
- England runs scored = 113 + 179 = 292 in 38.166
- England's runs per over (for) = 292 ÷ 38.166 = 7.65
Runs against
- Afghanistan 112 all out – 19.4 overs(v England)
- New Zealand 159/6 – 20 overs (v England)
- England runs against = 112 + 159 = 271 in 40 overs
- England's runs per over (against) = 6.78
Overall
- England's net run rate = 7.65 - 6.78 = 0.87 NRR
Seems I’m wrong, but I don’t see how they knew SA had qualified.