I said that after the first test, and was called out for it by a poster on here. I suggested that it was going to be difficult to win the series after going behind as my impression was/is that Australia don't lose many series after going behind. I got 2005 thrown back at me, ignoring the fact that I never said that they never lose series after going behind. Hey ho.
Every test match is big in the Ashes, But in the first test you must not lose and the Aussies knew how big a win that was, England playing Bazball cricket facing the best team at test cricket is crazy with the odds against winning or getting something out of the test, Yes it's great to watch when winning, but not when your losing,
The Ashes are bigger than that in my book, You have to respect what it means to the fans of England, You are gambling on getting a score on the board so you can get you in the game and put the pressure on them,
Also, the ageing England bowling attack is showing why a score on the board is needed first, 450 is the magic number in test cricket, That's why we lost the first test, Them 50-odd runs were the difference and sort of sent out a bad message that we don't respect your batters,
Wood and Woakes have to start in the next test, even the spinner Rehan
Ahmed must play, Even If that means Anderson and Robinson or Broad missing out then so be it, Stopping the Whitewash is the aim now