discopop
Well-Known Member
The Ali at three is even weirder when you see that his average shows that he’s better lower down the inning @ 7, I know it’s a run chase but it’s not like we needed a pinch hitter to get the innings off to a flyer.
Just saying on commentary that Micheal Nesser is going to play for Glamorgan this week and rejoin the Aussie squad after the game. It is incredible how the counties help the touring teams get practice, you cannot even play Shield cricket in Australia at any time as an overseas player let alone to get practice during a series. Didin`t Smith and Labsuchagne plat games before the series as well?
I called a century because the probability is that at lest one of those four will fail in this innings.We’re chasing 251, not 351. No one needs to get a century. We just need one or two partnerships of note.
You’ve got to do what the opposition fear the most sometimes & a bit of Mark Wood would definitely shake them up a bit… although these two are going really really well at the minute & look quite set, it’s the batches of wickets we keep giving up that are the problem, that’s why people get so peeved at the likes of Crawley, they just open the doorWhen the next wicket falls I'd send out Wood or Broad to have a swing and try and knock off a few quick runs.
I relise it's a high percentage of the required total; I was thinking that if one guy scores big (okay,maybe not a century, but 70 or 80), it'd take the pressure off the other guys.Not enough time jim, we only need 137 more to win.
That's how I read it to be fair . Touch wood we can do it a little easier , ie these 2 stay in for an hour or so , but it only takes one to stay in and we will be roseyI relise it's a high percentage of the required total; I was thinking that if one guy scores big (okay,maybe not a century, but 70 or 80), it'd take the pressure off the other guys.