jimharri
Well-Known Member
Next winter will be messy.
True mate, but I don’t think this England team would bat that long - assuming we weren’t bowled out in the meantime that is! - before declaringI was aware of that, but I was looking at a point where it'd be hard to see us losing. If India somehow managed to score at nearly 7 per over to achieve that hypothetical 400 (a total rarely achieved in the fourth innings in a test),that'd be staggering. Whereas a target of, say, 300 (5 rpo) would be "gettable". But thanks anyway.
True mate, but I don’t think this England team would bat that long - assuming we weren’t bowled out in the meantime that is! - before declaring
Aussies can bowl gentle underarm full tosses outside the off stump and most of our batsmen would struggleAussies will want a good hard pitch that on day 4 turns corners! Be a miracle if we keep it tight 5-0 4-1 looking at if we win 2 test matches that be unbelievable
No chance, or very little chance, that 240 is enoughI don’t think It’ll be that high mate. 240 would be very difficult with Archer and Stokes bowling from the nursery end
The bloke on VAR had the original decision down as being out, when the original decision was 'not out', so the mix up started there.The question was why the sky graphic clearly said review retained
don't think soYeh. This is going to be done by the end of today isn't it.