M18CTID
Well-Known Member
True! Who knows what will be enough. 200 might do it but think I’d like something north of 250lol -100 up anyway
True! Who knows what will be enough. 200 might do it but think I’d like something north of 250lol -100 up anyway
Nasser says hiI am sick to death of Sly and their OTT favourable production and commentary in favour of India. Makes their coverage of the rags and dippers feel fair
well........hmmmWho’s better?
You are Sir Henry Newbolt and I claim my five guineas.
(for the very foc's)
I remember the 2013 home Ashes series. We were often 3 down for not many runs in that series but we still won 3-0 in the end.Pointless moaning thats what they want aggresive cricket.They wont change till the Aussies win 4 or 5 nil.We are always going to be for 3 for not many as Crawley,Pope Duckett are not good enough.
Forget Percy, I'd settle for a Root ton right now!I would settle for the tension of MacDonnell's cricket match in England, Their England.
Vitai Lampada pales beside
spin to Stokes could be terminal
Not necessarily. If they get to 250 as a team there’s a chanceSo England lose
she'll need a big rubber - things are warming up out there
I never said that. Someone commented about how shit Yorkshires batsmen were, I just commented that Bairstow didn’t too badly against us in Friday. When the fuck did I say he should be playing for England, or Crawley for that matter. Don’t be a dick dickieSo if Crawley is dropped and in his first county championship game he scores a ton in each innings, he should be up for consideration again?
Not necessarily. If they get to 250 as a team there’s a chance
Personally I think we are still well in this match. Don’t forget that if the 4 wickets that have fallen 3 of them are shitYou hope England can get 250 and then bowl at India, but with a full day's cricket India would bite your hand off right now