Cricket Thread

It's a poor average for an opener, and no amount of guff can disguise that. 35 tests now, it's long past the "bedding in" stage.
Since Strauss only Joe Denly 31 , Sam Robson 30 and Nick Compton 31 have higher I belive , we certainly need a good opener just there isn't one lol
 
Openers as a rule, generally average less than middle order, there are exemptions but his runs today have put us in a good postion , it would be fantastic if he could kick on and get big scores , but he seems to lack that mentality
Fair comment about the openers job being tougher due to the new ball. I still think he lacks the technical and mental skills to be anything like world class or the concentration to make regular bus scores, however his batting contributions in this test have been decent
 
Fair comment about the openers job being tougher due to the new ball. I still think he lacks the technical and mental skills to be anything like world class or the concentration to make regular bus scores, however his batting contributions in this test have been decent
100 ^ he does but look at my last reply as to who else we have used its an area that needs improvement 100% but it's hard to jump on the kid right now I feel, although I agree we need better
 
It's a poor average for an opener, and no amount of guff can disguise that. 35 tests now, it's long past the "bedding in" stage.

The issue with Crawley is if the top 6 matched his test average (28) and say 7 dropped a bit to 20, and 8 to 11 got 10, then you’re looking at team scores of around 230. Not good enough. His 40 odd is useful but is it really good enough to be averaging 28 after so many tests?

Crawley put up the 1st and 4th highest innings of either sides top 5.

1st and 4th out of 20 innings including 8 from the 4 highest ranked test batsmen run the world and he’s probably got the most criticism for getting out.
 
Crawley put up the 1st and 4th highest innings of either sides top 5.

1st and 4th out of 20 innings including 8 from the 4 highest ranked test batsmen run the world and he’s probably got the most criticism for getting out.
I guess the issue is its obvious he has the technique to be brilliant, but unfortunately not the mentality and that frustrates people so much they become blinkered , I agree with you however
 
That says more about the general standard of batting to be honest.

No it doesn’t, Steve Smith and Joe Root are widely considered two of the best batsmen ever to play the game.

Crawley just gets judged completely differently to every other player on either side.
 
Crawley put up the 1st and 4th highest innings of either sides top 5.

1st and 4th out of 20 innings including 8 from the 4 highest ranked test batsmen run the world and he’s probably got the most criticism for getting out.

There’s no doubting he’s a player but he hasn’t really learnt to play a situation
 
Crawley put up the 1st and 4th highest innings of either sides top 5.

1st and 4th out of 20 innings including 8 from the 4 highest ranked test batsmen run the world and he’s probably got the most criticism for getting out.

Root got his fair share tbh and is definitely more at fault, bot least because he's definitely better than how he's played. It's how Crawley gets out that is the annoying thing. He can be absolutely glorious and then throws it away. It's why he averages 28.
 
Crawley put up the 1st and 4th highest innings of either sides top 5.

1st and 4th out of 20 innings including 8 from the 4 highest ranked test batsmen run the world and he’s probably got the most criticism for getting out.
Read what I said. He got a couple of decent scores in 1 test, as I said, but if you think 28 is decent over 35 tests we strongly disagree. Also as I said if the top 6 average 28 then the team is lucky to top 250
 
We won't lose this.
That spinner looks like harry Potter and is bang average.
Blitz a quick 50 after lunch and its job done.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top