jimharri
Moderator
That was me. Anyone below Chelsea is 500/1 to win the league...Someone suggested all the worst teams are all 500/1 these days.
That was me. Anyone below Chelsea is 500/1 to win the league...Someone suggested all the worst teams are all 500/1 these days.
Exactly the same as the last one though format wise.48 matches in a tournament and only about 2 of them were tense and exciting at the end. Piss poor format.
All bar 5 games were D/N, it was only when 2 games on some Saturdays they had a day game.Why not play it the morning/afternoon and not a day-nighter knowing the conditions?
No trophy for that, I'm afraid. And they won't be remembered for that. They've been battered out there today. That stadium sounds like Central library at 3 on a Sunday morning.
The format was shit last time tooIndia beat all other 9 teams including NZ twice. Australia look like beating all other 9 teams, avenging their 2 loses in the semi and the final looking at 9 wins in row, as opposed to India ten.
What a fantastic story, and hopefully we get a clear winner not a count back Tie.
Australia written off by some after their first two games (but were still 4th favourite then).
Exactly the same as the last one though format wise.
All bar 5 games were D/N, it was only when 2 games on some Saturdays they had a day game.
It could have been Kohli.The thought of Smith and Warner celebrating is fucking sickening.
They have been well beaten but the winning Toss makes a big difference
It's ODI cricket matey
the ICC World Cup Final 50 overs winners take all, The best team or not its pretty much like cup football,
It could have been Kohli.
How so? The Indian captain very clearly said it was a good wicket and if he’d won the toss he would have BATTED FIRST. So how did the toss affect the result today? Australia have just batted, bowled and fielded better (and seemingly done their homework better)They have been well beaten but the winning Toss makes a big difference
That’s Adam ZampaWho's the lady on the Aussie bench? A medic?
Asking for a friend, see?
Sharma said if he’d won the toss he’d have batted first so how does that work?
Yep. They were batting first, regardless of the toss.How so? The Indian captain very clearly said it was a good wicket and if he’d won the toss he would have BATTED FIRST. So how did the toss affect the result today? Australia have just batted, bowled and fielded better (and seemingly done their homework better)
It’s exactly what he said. India were batting first whoever won the toss so stop bleating g about it. The Aussies have (unfortunately) just battered themAm not sure he would its what you say when losing the toss!
They’ll know that they won in spite of them rather than because of them though.The thought of Smith and Warner celebrating is fucking sickening.