Cricket Thread

Going to be a very tough ask this. Not sure whether we go for the free-scoring approach or dig in for a change. Trouble is, if it's the latter then we'll potentially be facing a lot more overs and if it's spinning round corners....maybe a compromise between the 2 approaches might be the best way to go about it

The cynic in me says, we get nowhere near their total.
 
Why do the cricketers have such high numbers on their shirts ?

I like the thinking behind Root 66.

I always though Harry Winks should have been 40 and Gabriel Heinze a 57.
 
Why do the cricketers have such high numbers on their shirts ?

I like the thinking behind Root 66.

I always though Harry Winks should have been 40 and Gabriel Heinze a 57.

i-see-what-you-did-there-is3g19xgxm0ub2x5.gif
 
The cynic in me says, we get nowhere near their total.

Actually, I think that's just fairly sober and realistic. But hey, Root and Brook are capable of astonishing things — we know that. Few, if any, thought that Crawley and Duckett were going to dig us out of this hole.
Interesting match, anyway.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.