Twigglett said:Most of you are taking this whole sponsorship-funded transfer out of context. It would be entailed as part of the new Nike deal. The money Nike put forward would come solely from the contract, meaning United will get less annual money from it. However, they would most likely still profit from the increased shirt sales.
There's nothing corrupt about it.
OK Etihad decide they need more exposure so they decide to increase the sponsorship with City, to increase the marketing value, they Buy Messi for 200,000,000 and say it comes from the increased sponsorship deal.