Maybe because City has too many wingers and is desperate for a proper striker?
Wingers options: Mahrez, Torres, Sterling, Jesus (that wanna play wide from now on) also Foden, Grealish and Bernardo that are able to play there too
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cristiano Ronaldo
- Thread starter Rhapsody in Blue
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Wingers options: Mahrez, Torres, Sterling, Jesus (that wanna play wide from now on) also Foden, Grealish and Bernardo that are able to play there too
Keith Moncrieff
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 498
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Two seasons at City and off he fucks to NYC.
None of those cunts. Don't mind Rasgfird generally. But hate Giggs, Rooney and Ronaldo. Yet I'll take Ronaldo for 1 year.Would you prefer Rooney or Giggs? Sir Marcus Rashford, perhaps instead?
Could well be the last night at the transfer window.
Is that Shouty Man?
Torres is no Winger :)Maybe because City has too many wingers and is desesparated for a proper striker?
Wingers options: Mahrez, Torres, Sterling, Jesus (that wanna play wide from now on) also Foden, Grealish and Bernardo that are able to play there
That boy a Striker!!! Put some Respek on his name :)
kaz7
Well-Known Member
If you post it you translate it ,pet hate of mineIt’s hardly a hardship to click on the tweet and press ‘translate tweet’. No need to be so hostile towards posters.
better dead than red
Well-Known Member
If I have to explain it, it wasn't funny I suppose.None of those cunts. Don't mind Rasgfird generally. But hate Giggs, Rooney and Ronaldo. Yet I'll take Ronaldo for 1 year.
colesy
Well-Known Member
I take Ronaldo just to piss the rags off, and then put him on our bench.
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
If Kane was £80-90m it would have been more realistic and I would have been more disappointed at not getting him. Kane at £150-160m is laughable. Even just a few mere hours on from it collapsing, the thought of us paying that seems like one of the most ridiculous things you could ever tell me. I feel relieved we didn’t pay that for him!I feel dirty saying this. And I might need a rag to wipe my dirt off, but I prefer Cristiano at 25 million to Kane at 160.
And I really dislike Ronaldo and think he is mostly self absorbed. But the dude works hard as fuck. And kills to deliver.
Anyway, I said. Now I'm going off to take a hot bath :)
CRonaldo at £75m is better than Kane at £160m, but £25?! Fucking get him!
Last edited by a moderator:
FromPollockToSilva
Well-Known Member
Always been British me,never English don't ask why.
Nothing wrong with wanting to be associated with our original Celtic ancestors instead of those Germanic Angle interlopers
- Status
- Not open for further replies.