Daniel Agger

[i8rags]

Re: Agger Bid

Grow up you moaning little bitches. I'm not going to sit on here all day updating you minute to minute on How I know, Why I know or What time i was told. Last time i post any info on here.

Bizarre reply, you don't have to sit on here all day, updating minute by minute, try this,
Fee agreed, guaranteed info from inside the club from Fred who has seen the contract, medical soon, signs next week, etc. It's not that hard really. Last time you post info ffs, what info.

 

[Dextersmate]

Re: Agger Bid

'Annoying' is when people post 'info' and then dont explain the hows and whys of that info or their source.

There is so much of that in this forum it's ridiculous.

If someone has genuine info please just give a little detail / explanation / background as to how you know.

In any normal conversation in life if a person gives you imortant info you tend to ask how they know the info. This is a normal human conversational transaction. We dont tend to just 'take things at face value' normally do we? especially if the info is meaningful or impactive.

Why should the rules be any different on here?

Either spill (unless there is a genuine reason why you cant) the beans properly or as I said earlier GTFO. Basic courtesy.

It's pretty simple really, anyone getting information out of contactcs at the club has to guard their source as it would be detrimental to their job if it became an Internet topic. The club has plugged almost all leaks in recent years and looks upon leaks as a serious breach.

Either put up or shut up,what is the point of saying i know something but can,t tell you?.

 

[Marvin]

Re: Agger Bid

Joined in may this year, posts fee agreed without any reason on how he got the info. Ban him pls if he doesn't explain.

And why would Liverpool sell? If they have any ambition like Marvin said why would they sell one of their best players to another top side.. they don't need the money..

It wouldn't make much sense for Liverpool to sell, but that's assuming they still have the ambition to be a top club and their owners are intent on committing the investment required.

 

[Ethan23]

Re: Agger Bid

the only way we will get agger is if we pay in the lescott bracket price... and possibly more...Liverpool will no doubt want 25 we will want 18... realistically meet somewhere in the middle.

I could see Agger to City for 22/23 million... a very good signing

 

[Matt.D]

Re: Agger Bid

the only way we will get agger is if we pay in the lescott bracket price... and possibly more...Liverpool will no doubt want 25 we will want 18... realistically meet somewhere in the middle.

I could see Agger to City for 22/23 million... a very good signing

agree, although im not sure they will play hardball the same way Everton did for Lescott. They wanted that cash to ease their debts, im pretty sure that Rogers needs a lotttt of new players in order to get that shower of shit playing the way he wants. and they blew all their budget last summer, so he needs to sell to buy and is running out of time, so i cant see the Agger situation dragging on much longer. New deal or transfer for him in the next 10 days i reckon.

 

[cmdub]

Re: Agger Bid

Joined in may this year, posts fee agreed without any reason on how he got the info. Ban him pls if he doesn't explain.

And why would Liverpool sell? If they have any ambition like Marvin said why would they sell one of their best players to another top side.. they don't need the money..

It wouldn't make much sense for Liverpool to sell, but that's assuming they still have the ambition to be a top club and their owners are intent on committing the investment required.

yea i completely agree plus do they have a reasonable 3rd place CB that could take his spot? i mean rodgers just came in and ur gonna sell arguably one of his best players to another top club? he wants to win and compete for top 4 and i really believe he can i like the signings hes done and who they're rumored to sign. i cant see him being happy at all if we sign him regardless of whats paid. they dont need the money and they need to keep agger

 

[ROCKET80]

Re: Agger Bid

Joined in may this year, posts fee agreed without any reason on how he got the info. Ban him pls if he doesn't explain.

And why would Liverpool sell? If they have any ambition like Marvin said why would they sell one of their best players to another top side.. they don't need the money..

It wouldn't make much sense for Liverpool to sell, but that's assuming they still have the ambition to be a top club and their owners are intent on committing the investment required.

yea i completely agree plus do they have a reasonable 3rd place CB that could take his spot? i mean rodgers just came in and ur gonna sell arguably one of his best players to another top club? he wants to win and compete for top 4 and i really believe he can i like the signings hes done and who they're rumored to sign. i cant see him being happy at all if we sign him regardless of whats paid. they dont need the money and they need to keep agger

They'd sell, at the end of the day they are now a mediocre club with no prospect of Champions League football in the near future.

Agger is 28/29(?) a quality player and no doubt ambitious, does he want a last chance to play on the big stageand competing for trophies or would he prefer being another footnote in the 'istree books of a fallen giant?

Liverpool are on a par now with Newcastle, Everton, WBA, Sunderland etc...If one of the big boys want one of their players it'll be tough for them to stop the player leaving....exactly how we were a few seasons ago.

 

[waspish]

Agger Bid

It wouldn't make much sense for Liverpool to sell, but that's assuming they still have the ambition to be a top club and their owners are intent on committing the investment required.

yea i completely agree plus do they have a reasonable 3rd place CB that could take his spot? i mean rodgers just came in and ur gonna sell arguably one of his best players to another top club? he wants to win and compete for top 4 and i really believe he can i like the signings hes done and who they're rumored to sign. i cant see him being happy at all if we sign him regardless of whats paid. they dont need the money and they need to keep agger

They'd sell, at the end of the day they are now a mediocre club with no prospect of Champions League football in the near future.

Agger is 28/29(?) a quality player and no doubt ambitious, does he want a last chance to play on the big stageand competing for trophies or would he prefer being another footnote in the 'istree books of a fallen giant?

Liverpool are on a par now with Newcastle, Everton, WBA, Sunderland etc...If one of the big boys want one of their players it'll be tough for them to stop the player leaving....exactly how we were a few seasons ago.

You may have a point there ;)

 

[moomba]

Re: Agger Bid

With two years left on his contract Liverpool would be stupid not to consider selling.

He'll be worth £10m less this time next season if he doesn't want to sign another contract, so they'll ask themselves if it's worth keeping him for 12 months for £10m, or 24 months for £20m.

 

[Cityisland]

Re: Agger Bid

MEN saying we have upped our bid to 18mil.

<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1585368_manchester-city-up-bid-for-daniel-agger" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... niel-agger</a>


Manchester City up bid for Daniel Agger

August 06, 2012

Manchester City have upped their bid for Liverpool defender Daniel Agger to £18m.

The Blues have already been unsuccessful with one £13m bid for the Danish centre-half as boss Roberto Mancini looks to bring in cover for Joleon Lescott and Vincent Kompany.

Meanwhile, City have not given up hope of bagging Roma midfield star Daniele de Rossi in a £15m move.