Danny Ings

Status
Not open for further replies.
Patientman63 said:
For me? I rate him. An instinctive goal poacher, a 6 yard box opportunist, which is what we need. Depends on the price tho, obvs he injury prone, but we don't need to play him every 3 days, Pep loves to mix 'n match. Deffo keep GJ tho' cos his contribution is phenomenal. Play 'em alternatively or together. I thinks he'd surprise a lot on these pages.
Click to expand...



We`ll get killed in the rush for Ings. Bayern, Inter, Real, Madrid Barcelona, PSG, Chelsea, United and Liverpool.

My arse
 
Gaudion M said:
We have never broke a transfer record. We have improved every position as and when with better players. Is he better than what we have? I think he could be an option. And the £100m+ less he would cost than a top draw player would go elsewhere.

Its unlikely but you need options. You need an alternative to getting rinsed in the market.
Click to expand...
We won’t be breaking any transfer record for Haaland or any other top striker except our own, and it should be this way. We are signing the replacement of our biggest player. We won’t be paying for that guy, whoever he is, the same we paid for Rodri or Dias; it will be considerably more because strikers are the most expense position (and also the one that gives the most back) and because that is how much it costs to sustain the ambitions we have. If we mess it up in signing a striker, it looks pretty clear to me that Chelsea and United will be serious threats to us next year. When Pep fell in love with Mbappe, we were willing to go up to 120 (some say 130) million for him, but he wanted to stay in France. We once again have the money for that major signing. A player like Ings or an unproven talent in top level will not be replacing Manchester City’s biggest striker ever. Period
 
r.soleofsalford said:
We`ll get killed in the rush for Ings. Bayern, Inter, Real, Madrid Barcelona, PSG, Chelsea, United and Liverpool.

My arse
Click to expand...
Fair enough.

Tho' I do wonder if the red scousers considered it that way before taking a punt on Mo Sala, or the with Suarez, or Leicester with Vardy, or currently Kelechi Iheanacho, remember him? Just cos a player hasn't hit the heights with previous clubs, doesn't necessarily make him shit, they just didn't get the opportunity. A club can pay a fortune for a "top rated" player, who rocks up as a dog, just ask Utd, or Everton or Chelsea, or any other club who paid millions for a "worldy" that went on to stink the place out. I still have nightmares about Bradbury (remove the r's as the joke went), and Vuoso, Fowler et al.

As I've said, it's only my opinion, so it's worth ensuring your underwear remains in alignment.
 
Would make a good backup/ rotation. Don't get why people are acting like he's bad. Defs not want him as the main striker tho
 
No thanks. He’d spent more time on the injury list than actually playing. He’s the modern day Mcmanaman
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.