Danny Ings

[brummie blue]

We must be mad if there is a hint of truth in this...
He's 28, injury prone and and a mid table premier team player at best.

We need to be buying a player for the next 8-10 years. Only Haaland or Mbappé fit the bill. Invest for the future.

 

[Tevez City]

1- Jesus for PL & CL
2- Delap for FA & Carabo Cup

3- If it didn't work well, the team is performing better without any striker.

I think its better be someone exceptional or the team can handle it without additional average striker.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

We must be mad if there is a hint of truth in this...
He's 28, injury prone and and a mid table premier team player at best.

We need to be buying a player for the next 8-10 years. Only Haaland or Mbappé fit the bill. Invest for the future.

This is just a fake news story put out by his agent and published by a Sky Sports reporter (who supports the Rags). Ings is desperate to get out of Southampton because he is in a contract row with them, just like he was at his previous clubs. Ings is a publicity-seeking injury crock who has the grand total of eight goals this season. It's not long till April Fools Day.

 

[Patientman63]

For me? I rate him. An instinctive goal poacher, a 6 yard box opportunist, which is what we need. Depends on the price tho, obvs he injury prone, but we don't need to play him every 3 days, Pep loves to mix 'n match. Deffo keep GJ tho' cos his contribution is phenomenal. Play 'em alternatively or together. I thinks he'd surprise a lot on these pages.

 

[Deleted member 87819]

For me? I rate him. An instinctive goal poacher, a 6 yard box opportunist, which is what we need. Depends on the price tho, obvs he injury prone, but we don't need to play him every 3 days, Pep loves to mix 'n match. Deffo keep GJ tho' cos his contribution is phenomenal. Play 'em alternatively or together. I thinks he'd surprise a lot on these pages.

The numbers are pretty pathetic for “an instinctive goal poacher”

 

[Summerbuzz]

I can't help back to Jonny Evans - another 'mid table' player who would have been no use to us WHATSOEVER AT ANY POINT during the last five years before Dias finally arrived.

 

[Patientman63]

The numbers are pretty pathetic for “an instinctive goal poacher”

Probably due to who he's been playing for and scoring chances they create. We create chances, lots of em, just need someone to knock them in. If the club don't fancy spunking 100m plus for Haaland/Kane, they'd do a lot worse imho.

 

[roy.or.r]

HAHAHAHAHAHA.

 

[Gareth Barry Conlon]

We must be mad if there is a hint of truth in this...
He's 28, injury prone and and a mid table premier team player at best.

We need to be buying a player for the next 8-10 years. Only Haaland or Mbappé fit the bill. Invest for the future.

We have never broke a transfer record. We have improved every position as and when with better players. Is he better than what we have? I think he could be an option. And the £100m+ less he would cost than a top draw player would go elsewhere.

Its unlikely but you need options. You need an alternative to getting rinsed in the market.

 

[Deleted member 87819]

Probably due to who he's been playing for and scoring chances they create. We create chances, lots of em, just need someone to knock them in. If the club don't fancy spunking 100m plus for Haaland/Kane, they'd do a lot worse imho.

This is a fake rumor, it’s not even worth talking about. Let the thread die