Darren Cann | Named as linesman vs Palace for his final game (p11)

PannickAtTheDisco

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
23,602
Location
not at CAS
Time for a protest?

Mike Jones referee for Palace v City, meh.

But Darren Cann, an ex-Palace youth player who's not officiated Palace in the Prem since their promotion, is one of the linesman.

That's not on.
 
Time for a protest?

Mike Jones referee for Palace v City, meh.

But Darren Cann, an ex-Palace youth player who's not officiated Palace in the Prem since their promotion, is one of the linesman.

That's not on.
Definitely!
 
Time for a protest?

Mike Jones referee for Palace v City, meh.

But Darren Cann, an ex-Palace youth player who's not officiated Palace in the Prem since their promotion, is one of the linesman.

That's not on.
You are joking ??
 
You are joking ??

nope.
http://www.thefa.com/news/2017/jan/23/emirates-fa-cup-fourth-round-match-officials-230117

16 Crystal Palace FC v Manchester City FC 3pm, Saturday 28 January
Referee Michael Jones
Assistant Referees Darren Cann & Andrew Halliday
Fourth Official Andy Davies

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darren_Cann_(referee)
Before becoming a referee, Cann was a promising footballer playing in the Youth Team for Norwich City[2] and being signed by Steve Coppell in the 1980s for Crystal Palace.[3] He played regularly for the Youth Team and Reserves, but did not make any first team appearances.
 
Time for a protest?

Mike Jones referee for Palace v City, meh.

But Darren Cann, an ex-Palace youth player who's not officiated Palace in the Prem since their promotion, is one of the linesman.

That's not on.

Wow you aren't even kidding!?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darren_Cann_(referee)

asteioi-thanatoi-tainies.jpg
 
I'm sure Sky, BT and the BBC will rally around our cause.

Lol.
That blatant a conflict of interest after the controversy on Saturday will be extremely embarrassing for the FA, they'll have to pull him in case he's involved in a controversial decision if it's raised publicly beforehand, if they don't and he is its negligence on their behalf.
 
Needs to be all over Twitter & other social media. The club should be objecting as well.
100%, that's as blatant a conflict of interest as you get, there's no way in hell we should have an ex palace player officiating one of their games, especially with so many potential officials to choose from, it's as bad as Mason refereeing the rags v qpr game in 2012.
 
That is a massive oversight by the FA, but he should have put his hands up straight away.

It's not a secret, so it's not Cann's doing.

I've had a look and it appears that Cann hasn't been assistant for Palace this season or last, which seems unlikely to be a fluke. Why he's been appointed for this one is baffling - whether one believes it's deliberate sabotage or not.
 
It's not a secret, so it's not Cann's doing.

I've had a look and it appears that Cann hasn't been assistant for Palace this season or last, which seems unlikely to be a fluke. Why he's been appointed for this one is baffling - whether one believes it's deliberate sabotage or not.

This isn't an oversight this is a statement that we do what we fucking want. It's saying we are bent now pack up & fuck off.

As a matter of interest I think we pay too much attention to the refs & ignore the linesmans impact in our games.
 
Simon Mullock has mentioned that he's going to ask Pep about it in the press conference on Friday:

 
They have and they are supposed to declare them to PGMOL. And that then renders them (in theory) ineligible to referee games involving those teams or where there might be a conflict of interest involving those teams. So when Mike Riley did his presentation to Points of Blue, he told the story that he (as a West Yorkshire ref) was taken off a Liverpool v Chelsea game as the result could impact Leeds, who were also in the title race at the time. Fair enough.

But think about declaring yourself as a United supporter. You wouldn't get United games, City games, Liverpool games or any game that might impact them, even Arsenal v Chelsea if that could impact a title race that the rags were involved in. So, in other words, no big games which isn't great for your career. And the same might well apply if you were a Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea fan by the way. Or even a Blue. So you'd be condemned to a lifetime of reffing West Brom v Stoke or Watford v Bournemouth games. And it also reduces the pool of refs eligible to do big games. The trouble is, when it comes to people like Mason and Taylor, they're local and people know them. People have run the line for them in their younger days or know their families. And people I know have said that Mason, despite having Bolton-watching brothers, was a regular match-goer at the Swamp in his younger days. And Taylor's family are well known to be rag fans, despite his supposed Alty connection. And I've said loads of time before, even if those allegiances were totally kosher, they should not be refereeing us or the rags inorder to avoid any potential accusations of conflicts of interest.

Mike Dean is a Tranmere fan who lives on the Wirral (part of the Cheshire FA) so he could referee Liverpool & Everton games. But as I understand it, he requested that he wasn't given those games for precisely the reason that Mason & Taylor should be given ours or the rags games. It was interesting to see that he finally did a Merseyside derby and it does make me wonder if that wasn't done as a parting gesture, and that he's standing down after this season. He's 49 this year so could, thinking about it, be the one to replace Riley if my thought about this being his last season in charge of PGMOL is correct.
I wouldn't mind if WE OFFICIALLY KNEW what there alegencies were so they could be judged by the court of statistics to be impartial by their actions.
 
Isn't this guy one of the media who gets info from the club, maybe it's a staged question we wanted to be asked to get the point out into the open. Pep doesn't have to kick off a good reply about pressure on the lad etc wouldn't cause any harm to Pep

No that's Simon Mullock, Simon Stone is the whiney voiced fucker who's asked Pep plenty of loaded or shite questions, he's also the one who called is 'ushited' in Peps first press conference.
 
Isn't this guy one of the media who gets info from the club, maybe it's a staged question we wanted to be asked to get the point out into the open. Pep doesn't have to kick off a good reply about pressure on the lad etc wouldn't cause any harm to Pep

You think? I reckon even that would be construed as questioning his integrity.
 
No that's Simon Mullock, Simon Stone is the whiney voiced fucker who's asked Pep plenty of loaded or shite questions, he's also the one who called is 'ushited' in Peps first press conference.

The tweet was from Mullock mate.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top