gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I think that's all fair comment.johnnytapia said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Michael Foot as Prime Minister would have invited ridicule upon this country to a harmful extent. I think of Norman Mailer's quote about Foot in that regard:
'To the American it was incredible that this man who looked like an eccentric professor of ornithology could run for Prime Minister
I think he was a decent, clever and principled man, but he would have been an unmitigated disaster as Prime Minister.
And I've personally got nothing against scruffy c**ts.
I think you've added to my earlier point GDM, namely, image became, circa 1980 (1960 in the States) a massively influential part of the political debate. Mailer is amongst the best writers of our generation (Executioner's Song, Oswald's Tale are two of the best books I've ever read) but he lays bare, in that quote, one of the fundamental problems of our society: image, and its influence on the political culture. If you look at the great thinkers, the great scientists, mathematicians etc, it mattered not one iota whether they looked like Bill Oddie in a white coat. It was the power of their argument, their ability to argue cogently and without recourse to spin doctors, that made them the giants they became. Had Einstein been invited on TV to discuss his ideas of relativity I have no doubt it would have made second place to Big Brother in the TV schedules. And therein lies the nub of our crumbling political edifice. We are fed a diet of utter shite. And, sadly, we want to dine on it 24/7.
He was a fucking scruffy **** though ;-)