David Coote

Uncle Wally One Ball said:
I would think that within the next Coote will be making statements that probably involve the terms sexuality, male friend, personal struggle, pressure of high profile, dealt with by substance abuse, and revenge or blackmail
Click to expand...

I think you have it nailed with that tbh.
 
TedofChume said:
Can anyone help me improve this post before I publish it:


The Dark Side of Jurgen Klopp: The Mistreatment and Corporate Bullying of David Coote

In the aftermath of a controversial video, Premier League referee David Coote has found himself at the centre of a storm, facing relentless criticism and abuse that originated with Liverpool FC manager Jürgen Klopp and defender Andy Robertson. What initially seemed like offhand remarks in a private setting have escalated into a public scandal, threatening Coote’s career and reputation. A closer examination reveals a troubling pattern: the deliberate undermining of a referee by a powerful club, its personnel, and its vast online fanbase.

A Timeline of Intimidation

The following are some of the key incidents involving Klopp, Robertson, and Coote:

After the Everton match: Klopp publicly criticised Coote’s performance, stating, "Michael Oliver is an excellent referee but he had the best view. Then VAR [Coote] forgets the rules."

After the Burnley match: Robertson, in a direct confrontation with Coote, unleashed a tirade: "How’s that not a penalty? It’s a disgrace. You didn’t see f****** anything the whole game apart from booking them in the last minute. What’s the point in having you in the middle? F*** me."

Coote’s response (in a private video): "I think Klopp is a c*** because he called me a liar," and "Liverpool are s***."


If an ordinary person experienced such repeated attacks, they might reasonably hold a similar opinion about those involved. Coote’s comments, though coarse, are a human response to being publicly maligned.

Corporate Bullying and Unlawful Behaviour

The behaviour of Klopp and Robertson extends beyond mere criticism; it is a clear example of corporate bullying. By using their high-profile positions at Liverpool FC to target an individual referee, they have employed tactics designed to discredit and intimidate. Corporate bullying of this kind is not only unethical but could be considered unlawful, especially given its impact on Coote’s personal and professional life.

The influence of Liverpool FC amplifies this issue. Klopp and Robertson’s actions are not those of individuals acting in isolation but are part of a broader culture of aggression and intimidation. Their comments, widely publicised and amplified by fan blogs and social media, serve as a rallying cry for Liverpool’s global fanbase, resulting in a cascade of abuse directed at Coote.

It is worth noting Coote will meet Liverpool supporters in everyday life and experience abuse from being called a liar and a cheat to his face, by various strangers with varying degrees of aggression, (clear beaches of the Public Order Act), since Klopp's first remarks and for the rest of his life.

Intimidation as a Form of Cheating

The strategy employed by Klopp and Robertson reveals a deeper, more cynical motive: manipulating future officiating decisions. By attacking Coote publicly, they put him in a no-win situation. If Coote feels intimidated and begins to favour Liverpool in future matches, Klopp and Robertson have successfully manipulated the referee. If Coote reacts defensively and makes calls against Liverpool, it seemingly "proves" their earlier accusations of bias, reinforcing the narrative they have created.

This is not merely poor sportsmanship; it is a deliberate attempt to influence the outcome of future matches and gain an unfair advantage, amounting to a form of cheating. Such tactics undermine the integrity of the sport and set a dangerous precedent where managers and players can exert undue pressure on match officials, knowing they hold significant sway over public opinion.

The Aftermath: Coote’s Reputation and Legal Ramifications

Coote’s reputation now lies in ruins. His career as a Premier League referee is effectively over, and he faces significant financial loss as a result of the smear campaign orchestrated by Klopp and Robertson. Their words have set off a chain reaction that has left him humiliated and professionally compromised. The critical question remains: has Coote done anything wrong? The answer is a resounding no. His remarks, made in what he believed to be a private setting, simply echoed sentiments already widespread among rival fans and pundits alike.

The escalation of this incident, however, was driven by a Liverpool fan blog that chose to make the video public, clearly aiming to humiliate Coote further. The nature of the recording raises serious concerns about privacy violations, as it appears more likely to be a video call rather than a deliberate self-recording by Coote. If this is the case, the video’s publication is not only unethical but potentially illegal, casting doubt on whether it can be used in any disciplinary actions against him.

Legal Action Against Liverpool FC

Given the clear harm Coote may suffer—both financially and reputationally—there is a strong argument that he should pursue legal action against Liverpool FC. The club, as the employer of Klopp and Robertson, bears responsibility for their conduct. Their wreckless and defamatory statements have had a tangible, detrimental impact on Coote’s life, and Liverpool FC should be held liable for damages. It is particularly notable that Liverpool FC has made no effort to diffuse the situation or discourage the aggressive behaviour of their fans, suggesting a tacit endorsement of these bullying tactics.

A Failure of Integrity

The deeper issue here is the influence top clubs like Liverpool exert over the integrity of the game. Klopp, known for his tendency to deflect blame in defeat, has frequently targeted match officials as a scapegoat. This pattern of behaviour is not accidental; it is a calculated strategy designed to intimidate referees and manipulate future decisions. Klopp’s previous actions, including inciting fans before the infamous attack on Manchester City’s bus, show a history of using Liverpool’s passionate support to his advantage. In Coote’s case, this has resulted in a public character assassination that unfairly taints the referee’s impartiality.

Time for Accountability

Ultimately, it is Klopp and Robertson who should be scrutinised for bringing the game into disrepute. Their calculated remarks have caused severe harm to Coote’s professional standing and could have long-lasting effects on the integrity of officiating in the Premier League. If football’s authorities are serious about fair play, they must confront the uncomfortable reality of what has happened here and hold Liverpool FC accountable for the actions of its representatives.

In the end, this saga reveals a troubling side to Jürgen Klopp’s management style—one reliant on public manipulation and pressure rather than integrity. It is time for the footballing world to recognise David Coote as a victim of abuse and intimidation and to punish Liverpool FC accordingly. Only then can the sport take a step towards restoring fairness and respect for its officials.
Click to expand...
He didn't say "Liverpool are shit", he said "Liverpool were shit" when asked specifically about the match they'd played against Burnley. There's a huge difference.
 
TedofChume said:
Can anyone help me improve this post before I publish it:


The Dark Side of Jurgen Klopp: The Mistreatment and Corporate Bullying of David Coote

In the aftermath of a controversial video, Premier League referee David Coote has found himself at the centre of a storm, facing relentless criticism and abuse that originated with Liverpool FC manager Jürgen Klopp and defender Andy Robertson. What initially seemed like offhand remarks in a private setting have escalated into a public scandal, threatening Coote’s career and reputation. A closer examination reveals a troubling pattern: the deliberate undermining of a referee by a powerful club, its personnel, and its vast online fanbase.

A Timeline of Intimidation

The following are some of the key incidents involving Klopp, Robertson, and Coote:

After the Everton match: Klopp publicly criticised Coote’s performance, stating, "Michael Oliver is an excellent referee but he had the best view. Then VAR [Coote] forgets the rules."

After the Burnley match: Robertson, in a direct confrontation with Coote, unleashed a tirade: "How’s that not a penalty? It’s a disgrace. You didn’t see f****** anything the whole game apart from booking them in the last minute. What’s the point in having you in the middle? F*** me."

Coote’s response (in a private video): "I think Klopp is a c*** because he called me a liar," and "Liverpool are s***."


If an ordinary person experienced such repeated attacks, they might reasonably hold a similar opinion about those involved. Coote’s comments, though coarse, are a human response to being publicly maligned.

Corporate Bullying and Unlawful Behaviour

The behaviour of Klopp and Robertson extends beyond mere criticism; it is a clear example of corporate bullying. By using their high-profile positions at Liverpool FC to target an individual referee, they have employed tactics designed to discredit and intimidate. Corporate bullying of this kind is not only unethical but could be considered unlawful, especially given its impact on Coote’s personal and professional life.

The influence of Liverpool FC amplifies this issue. Klopp and Robertson’s actions are not those of individuals acting in isolation but are part of a broader culture of aggression and intimidation. Their comments, widely publicised and amplified by fan blogs and social media, serve as a rallying cry for Liverpool’s global fanbase, resulting in a cascade of abuse directed at Coote.

It is worth noting Coote will meet Liverpool supporters in everyday life and experience abuse from being called a liar and a cheat to his face, by various strangers with varying degrees of aggression, (clear beaches of the Public Order Act), since Klopp's first remarks and for the rest of his life.

Intimidation as a Form of Cheating

The strategy employed by Klopp and Robertson reveals a deeper, more cynical motive: manipulating future officiating decisions. By attacking Coote publicly, they put him in a no-win situation. If Coote feels intimidated and begins to favour Liverpool in future matches, Klopp and Robertson have successfully manipulated the referee. If Coote reacts defensively and makes calls against Liverpool, it seemingly "proves" their earlier accusations of bias, reinforcing the narrative they have created.

This is not merely poor sportsmanship; it is a deliberate attempt to influence the outcome of future matches and gain an unfair advantage, amounting to a form of cheating. Such tactics undermine the integrity of the sport and set a dangerous precedent where managers and players can exert undue pressure on match officials, knowing they hold significant sway over public opinion.

The Aftermath: Coote’s Reputation and Legal Ramifications

Coote’s reputation now lies in ruins. His career as a Premier League referee is effectively over, and he faces significant financial loss as a result of the smear campaign orchestrated by Klopp and Robertson. Their words have set off a chain reaction that has left him humiliated and professionally compromised. The critical question remains: has Coote done anything wrong? The answer is a resounding no. His remarks, made in what he believed to be a private setting, simply echoed sentiments already widespread among rival fans and pundits alike.

The escalation of this incident, however, was driven by a Liverpool fan blog that chose to make the video public, clearly aiming to humiliate Coote further. The nature of the recording raises serious concerns about privacy violations, as it appears more likely to be a video call rather than a deliberate self-recording by Coote. If this is the case, the video’s publication is not only unethical but potentially illegal, casting doubt on whether it can be used in any disciplinary actions against him.

Legal Action Against Liverpool FC

Given the clear harm Coote may suffer—both financially and reputationally—there is a strong argument that he should pursue legal action against Liverpool FC. The club, as the employer of Klopp and Robertson, bears responsibility for their conduct. Their wreckless and defamatory statements have had a tangible, detrimental impact on Coote’s life, and Liverpool FC should be held liable for damages. It is particularly notable that Liverpool FC has made no effort to diffuse the situation or discourage the aggressive behaviour of their fans, suggesting a tacit endorsement of these bullying tactics.

A Failure of Integrity

The deeper issue here is the influence top clubs like Liverpool exert over the integrity of the game. Klopp, known for his tendency to deflect blame in defeat, has frequently targeted match officials as a scapegoat. This pattern of behaviour is not accidental; it is a calculated strategy designed to intimidate referees and manipulate future decisions. Klopp’s previous actions, including inciting fans before the infamous attack on Manchester City’s bus, show a history of using Liverpool’s passionate support to his advantage. In Coote’s case, this has resulted in a public character assassination that unfairly taints the referee’s impartiality.

Time for Accountability

Ultimately, it is Klopp and Robertson who should be scrutinised for bringing the game into disrepute. Their calculated remarks have caused severe harm to Coote’s professional standing and could have long-lasting effects on the integrity of officiating in the Premier League. If football’s authorities are serious about fair play, they must confront the uncomfortable reality of what has happened here and hold Liverpool FC accountable for the actions of its representatives.

In the end, this saga reveals a troubling side to Jürgen Klopp’s management style—one reliant on public manipulation and pressure rather than integrity. It is time for the footballing world to recognise David Coote as a victim of abuse and intimidation and to punish Liverpool FC accordingly. Only then can the sport take a step towards restoring fairness and respect for its officials.
Click to expand...

In terms of Klopp's behaviour, could mention that time he he chased one of the official's, behaving like a psychopath and pulled up having done his hamstring.
 
PYGMOL could start by cautioning coaches who step out of the technical area. If that doesn't work then only allow medical staff on touchline and keep coaches, subs etc in an enclosed area with no access to 4th official, who other than sorting subs out and holding the board up has become an obstacle for aggressive abuse from coaches and coaching staff. Never happen, I think like that. But something has got to happen, as referees and other officials are increasingly being harried by people who seem out of control, however momentarily, and are constantly attacked on social media. I think there is a link in the quality of referee's these days and the relentless onslaught of social media, tv and journalists. Who would want to be a referee when your private life is surreptitiously monitored looking for any mistake you make, then when it suits the people who have the information, bang, out it goes, another career/life ruined.
 
Last edited:
TedofChume said:
Can anyone help me improve this post before I publish it:


The Dark Side of Jurgen Klopp: The Mistreatment and Corporate Bullying of David Coote

In the aftermath of a controversial video, Premier League referee David Coote has found himself at the centre of a storm, facing relentless criticism and abuse that originated with Liverpool FC manager Jürgen Klopp and defender Andy Robertson. What initially seemed like offhand remarks in a private setting have escalated into a public scandal, threatening Coote’s career and reputation. A closer examination reveals a troubling pattern: the deliberate undermining of a referee by a powerful club, its personnel, and its vast online fanbase.

A Timeline of Intimidation

The following are some of the key incidents involving Klopp, Robertson, and Coote:

After the Everton match: Klopp publicly criticised Coote’s performance, stating, "Michael Oliver is an excellent referee but he had the best view. Then VAR [Coote] forgets the rules."

After the Burnley match: Robertson, in a direct confrontation with Coote, unleashed a tirade: "How’s that not a penalty? It’s a disgrace. You didn’t see f****** anything the whole game apart from booking them in the last minute. What’s the point in having you in the middle? F*** me."

Coote’s response (in a private video): "I think Klopp is a c*** because he called me a liar," and "Liverpool are s***."


If an ordinary person experienced such repeated attacks, they might reasonably hold a similar opinion about those involved. Coote’s comments, though coarse, are a human response to being publicly maligned.

Corporate Bullying and Unlawful Behaviour

The behaviour of Klopp and Robertson extends beyond mere criticism; it is a clear example of corporate bullying. By using their high-profile positions at Liverpool FC to target an individual referee, they have employed tactics designed to discredit and intimidate. Corporate bullying of this kind is not only unethical but could be considered unlawful, especially given its impact on Coote’s personal and professional life.

The influence of Liverpool FC amplifies this issue. Klopp and Robertson’s actions are not those of individuals acting in isolation but are part of a broader culture of aggression and intimidation. Their comments, widely publicised and amplified by fan blogs and social media, serve as a rallying cry for Liverpool’s global fanbase, resulting in a cascade of abuse directed at Coote.

It is worth noting Coote will meet Liverpool supporters in everyday life and experience abuse from being called a liar and a cheat to his face, by various strangers with varying degrees of aggression, (clear beaches of the Public Order Act), since Klopp's first remarks and for the rest of his life.

Intimidation as a Form of Cheating

The strategy employed by Klopp and Robertson reveals a deeper, more cynical motive: manipulating future officiating decisions. By attacking Coote publicly, they put him in a no-win situation. If Coote feels intimidated and begins to favour Liverpool in future matches, Klopp and Robertson have successfully manipulated the referee. If Coote reacts defensively and makes calls against Liverpool, it seemingly "proves" their earlier accusations of bias, reinforcing the narrative they have created.

This is not merely poor sportsmanship; it is a deliberate attempt to influence the outcome of future matches and gain an unfair advantage, amounting to a form of cheating. Such tactics undermine the integrity of the sport and set a dangerous precedent where managers and players can exert undue pressure on match officials, knowing they hold significant sway over public opinion.

The Aftermath: Coote’s Reputation and Legal Ramifications

Coote’s reputation now lies in ruins. His career as a Premier League referee is effectively over, and he faces significant financial loss as a result of the smear campaign orchestrated by Klopp and Robertson. Their words have set off a chain reaction that has left him humiliated and professionally compromised. The critical question remains: has Coote done anything wrong? The answer is a resounding no. His remarks, made in what he believed to be a private setting, simply echoed sentiments already widespread among rival fans and pundits alike.

The escalation of this incident, however, was driven by a Liverpool fan blog that chose to make the video public, clearly aiming to humiliate Coote further. The nature of the recording raises serious concerns about privacy violations, as it appears more likely to be a video call rather than a deliberate self-recording by Coote. If this is the case, the video’s publication is not only unethical but potentially illegal, casting doubt on whether it can be used in any disciplinary actions against him.

Legal Action Against Liverpool FC

Given the clear harm Coote may suffer—both financially and reputationally—there is a strong argument that he should pursue legal action against Liverpool FC. The club, as the employer of Klopp and Robertson, bears responsibility for their conduct. Their wreckless and defamatory statements have had a tangible, detrimental impact on Coote’s life, and Liverpool FC should be held liable for damages. It is particularly notable that Liverpool FC has made no effort to diffuse the situation or discourage the aggressive behaviour of their fans, suggesting a tacit endorsement of these bullying tactics.

A Failure of Integrity

The deeper issue here is the influence top clubs like Liverpool exert over the integrity of the game. Klopp, known for his tendency to deflect blame in defeat, has frequently targeted match officials as a scapegoat. This pattern of behaviour is not accidental; it is a calculated strategy designed to intimidate referees and manipulate future decisions. Klopp’s previous actions, including inciting fans before the infamous attack on Manchester City’s bus, show a history of using Liverpool’s passionate support to his advantage. In Coote’s case, this has resulted in a public character assassination that unfairly taints the referee’s impartiality.

Time for Accountability

Ultimately, it is Klopp and Robertson who should be scrutinised for bringing the game into disrepute. Their calculated remarks have caused severe harm to Coote’s professional standing and could have long-lasting effects on the integrity of officiating in the Premier League. If football’s authorities are serious about fair play, they must confront the uncomfortable reality of what has happened here and hold Liverpool FC accountable for the actions of its representatives.

In the end, this saga reveals a troubling side to Jürgen Klopp’s management style—one reliant on public manipulation and pressure rather than integrity. It is time for the footballing world to recognise David Coote as a victim of abuse and intimidation and to punish Liverpool FC accordingly. Only then can the sport take a step towards restoring fairness and respect for its officials.
Click to expand...
Paragraph 13, breaches not beaches.
 
Cellarite said:
He didn't say "Liverpool are shit", he said "Liverpool were shit" when asked specifically about the match they'd played against Burnley. There's a huge difference.
Click to expand...

It’s also, despite all the work that’s gone in to it, a bit irrelevant as well I suspect.

He’ll be getting sacked for the drugs not anything he said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.